2044 Posted June 10, 2018 Report Share Posted June 10, 2018 Someone added the 2021 procurement to the wiki and I'm wondering: has this actually been approved or is this a projection? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TechnicaProductions Posted June 10, 2018 Report Share Posted June 10, 2018 1 hour ago, ADB said: Someone added the 2021 procurement to the wiki and I'm wondering: has this actually been approved or is this a projection? It's a projection currently Also is the 3400-3453 fleet number for the LFS HEVs actually confirmed or speculation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2044 Posted June 10, 2018 Report Share Posted June 10, 2018 14 minutes ago, TechnicaProductions said: It's a projection currently Also is the 3400-3453 fleet number for the LFS HEVs actually confirmed or speculation? If it's a projection, then it should be removed. Fleet numbers have been confirmed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smallspy Posted June 10, 2018 Report Share Posted June 10, 2018 1 hour ago, ADB said: If it's a projection, then it should be removed. Fleet numbers have been confirmed. Actually there will be 55 buses being delivered in this order. Therefore the range will be 3400-3454. Dan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2044 Posted June 11, 2018 Report Share Posted June 11, 2018 1 hour ago, smallspy said: Actually there will be 55 buses being delivered in this order. Therefore the range will be 3400-3454. Dan Is that an extra bus or a bus taken from the 271 diesel batch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xtrazsteve Posted June 11, 2018 Report Share Posted June 11, 2018 52 minutes ago, ADB said: Is that an extra bus or a bus taken from the 271 diesel batch? A bus from the 271 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FabianColeyLOVESBUSES Posted June 11, 2018 Report Share Posted June 11, 2018 https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/2018/06/11/diesel-buses-purchase-not-the-better-way-for-ttc.html I just saw this article about ttc going back to natural gas buses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smallspy Posted June 11, 2018 Report Share Posted June 11, 2018 12 minutes ago, FabianColeyLOVESBUSES said: https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/2018/06/11/diesel-buses-purchase-not-the-better-way-for-ttc.html I just saw this article about ttc going back to natural gas buses. They aren't going back to CNG. They are simply studying it and how it could happen with help from Enbridge. Dan 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FabianColeyLOVESBUSES Posted June 11, 2018 Report Share Posted June 11, 2018 oh yes that is true you just reminded me that they are going to study the cng technology before considering going for the purchase of cng buses again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dowlingm Posted June 14, 2018 Report Share Posted June 14, 2018 On 6/11/2018 at 12:38 PM, FabianColeyLOVESBUSES said: https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/2018/06/11/diesel-buses-purchase-not-the-better-way-for-ttc.html I just saw this article about ttc going back to natural gas buses. Not so much an article but a puff piece for natural gas buses from a New York based organization. And the Star printed it anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xtrazsteve Posted June 14, 2018 Report Share Posted June 14, 2018 I think they are better off with converting busy routes into trolley bus routes than to go with electric or CNG buses. Taking the cost of each vehicles and installation of infrastructure, the cost can be similar but trolley buses is a proven technology. With modern batteries, trolley buses can disconnect and detour for a short distance. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTC T6H-5307N 2252 Posted June 14, 2018 Report Share Posted June 14, 2018 23 minutes ago, Xtrazsteve said: I think they are better off with converting busy routes into trolley bus routes than to go with electric or CNG buses. Taking the cost of each vehicles and installation of infrastructure, the cost can be similar but trolley buses is a proven technology. With modern batteries, trolley buses can disconnect and detour for a short distance. Routes 6, 7, 26, 32, 40, 47, 61, 63, 74, 75, 84, 89, 94, and 98 would be suitable for a trolley bus network? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drum118 Posted June 14, 2018 Report Share Posted June 14, 2018 1 hour ago, TTC T6H-5307N 2252 said: Routes 6, 7, 26, 32, 40, 47, 61, 63, 74, 75, 84, 89, 94, and 98 would be suitable for a trolley bus network? People may want Trolley buses, but not going happen. A fair number of systems have moved to CNG or in the process, but not in TTC cards. It may deal with pollution very well, but the overhead become pollution that is not welcome by many, including me. Some years ago I was on the Ministry of the Environment Round Table Committee where representatives from the CNG industries were pushing the government to get transit agencies to move to CNG since there were better engines and other options out there than going to hybird and using diesel. It never made it to the recommendation list going to cabinet. A lot of recommendations that did go to cabinet never saw the light of day. E Buses are the future, but years off for lower cost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xtrazsteve Posted June 14, 2018 Report Share Posted June 14, 2018 1 hour ago, drum118 said: People may want Trolley buses, but not going happen. A fair number of systems have moved to CNG or in the process, but not in TTC cards. It may deal with pollution very well, but the overhead become pollution that is not welcome by many, including me. Some years ago I was on the Ministry of the Environment Round Table Committee where representatives from the CNG industries were pushing the government to get transit agencies to move to CNG since there were better engines and other options out there than going to hybird and using diesel. It never made it to the recommendation list going to cabinet. A lot of recommendations that did go to cabinet never saw the light of day. E Buses are the future, but years off for lower cost. I do like to see eBuses take off if they are reliable and can cover the range of busy routes. TTC had problems with CNG buses in the past and decided it's not worth it. Same with the hybrids and we'll see how these new hybrids perform. With today's technology, trolley buses will be superior to eBuses in terms of reliability, mileage and vehicle life. I rather be on a bus that doesn't break down and can get me from A to B on a cold winter day than to have nothing show up. Although the presence of more more overhead wires is unwanted by many, many of streets have hydro wires and poles along the side. It's not exactly unpolluted. 3 hours ago, TTC T6H-5307N 2252 said: Routes 6, 7, 26, 32, 40, 47, 61, 63, 74, 75, 84, 89, 94, and 98 would be suitable for a trolley bus network? If the TTC was to install a trolley bus network, it will be for busy routes like the 7, 29, 39/199 and 35/195. Routes with high ridership and less branches. I expect none of the technology are going to work out for the TTC and they're go back to diesel buses in the future or no buses at all. I don't not believe TTC will be ordering all emission free buses by 2025 nor would they set up a trolley bus network. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bus_Medic Posted June 14, 2018 Report Share Posted June 14, 2018 12 hours ago, dowlingm said: Not so much an article but a puff piece for natural gas buses from a New York based organization. And the Star printed it anyway. It’s a non starter as written. all the gas those digesters produce goes into the tanks of the waste collection truck fleet. There’s nothing left for the TTC anyway. 9 hours ago, drum118 said: People may want Trolley buses, but not going happen. A fair number of systems have moved to CNG or in the process, but not in TTC cards. It may deal with pollution very well, but the overhead become pollution that is not welcome by many, including me. Some years ago I was on the Ministry of the Environment Round Table Committee where representatives from the CNG industries were pushing the government to get transit agencies to move to CNG since there were better engines and other options out there than going to hybird and using diesel. It never made it to the recommendation list going to cabinet. A lot of recommendations that did go to cabinet never saw the light of day. E Buses are the future, but years off for lower cost. If the engines are “better”,how come the the CNG garbage trucks (all Westport 9 litres) are lining up outside of Mid Ontario Mack’s door for inframe rebuilds at only 350 000km? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drum118 Posted June 14, 2018 Report Share Posted June 14, 2018 3 hours ago, Bus_Medic said: It’s a non starter as written. all the gas those digesters produce goes into the tanks of the waste collection truck fleet. There’s nothing left for the TTC anyway. If the engines are “better”,how come the the CNG garbage trucks (all Westport 9 litres) are lining up outside of Mid Ontario Mack’s door for inframe rebuilds at only 350 000km? I'm no engine expert, but based on what I read and knew at the time, I didn't support the idea of moving to CNG at the round table and not the only one who didn't support the idea. I have lost a few non CNG engines under 200,000 km doing mostly highway driving. One only has to look to Hamilton HRS, Translink to see what is taking place. Seen a number of US system testing out CNG and some have move 100% to it. Then funding and environment requirements are paid for by state and feds to make the move. Others are going E bus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drum118 Posted June 14, 2018 Report Share Posted June 14, 2018 http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-met-cta-electric-buses-20180613-story.html https://www.greenfleetmagazine.com/302899/whats-the-future-for-cng 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drum118 Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 TTC to add 10 Xcelsior CHARGE battery-electric buses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kobayashi Posted June 26, 2018 Report Share Posted June 26, 2018 Looks like the LFS HEV order is now numbered #3400-#3569 (170 buses in total). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TechnicaProductions Posted June 26, 2018 Report Share Posted June 26, 2018 40 minutes ago, BYD said: Looks like the LFS HEV order is now numbered #3400-#3569 (170 buses in total). You got a credible source? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mar_AC_23 Posted June 26, 2018 Report Share Posted June 26, 2018 4 minutes ago, TechnicaProductions said: You got a credible source? Take a look at the service summary. https://www.ttc.ca/PDF/Transit_Planning/Service Summary_2018-06-24.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D40-90 Posted June 26, 2018 Report Share Posted June 26, 2018 On 6/25/2018 at 6:22 PM, drum118 said: TTC to add 10 Xcelsior CHARGE battery-electric buses So much for people saying NFI waste their time bidding on bus contracts. There's an option for up to 30 too 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smallspy Posted June 27, 2018 Report Share Posted June 27, 2018 13 hours ago, D40-90 said: So much for people saying NFI waste their time bidding on bus contracts. There's an option for up to 30 too NFI didn't bid on this - it was sole-sourced. Just like the other contracts to BYD and Proterra. Dan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ontario_Transit Posted June 27, 2018 Report Share Posted June 27, 2018 14 hours ago, TechnicaProductions said: You got a credible source? I think that might be what you are looking for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed T. Posted June 27, 2018 Report Share Posted June 27, 2018 1 hour ago, Ontario_Transit said: I think that might be what you are looking for Duplicating Shemar's comment made half a day earlier. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now