spliffmansmith Posted October 1, 2010 Report Share Posted October 1, 2010 Something does not look right here (Ottawa/Hull Members are Disqualified) Something to do with the GPS board and location?? Does the #5 bus have a stop at Elgin/ Queen, or should the #5 and #2 (the bus ahead) not be at the same location. Or maybe I'm miles off.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VancouversLocalNerd Posted October 1, 2010 Report Share Posted October 1, 2010 What's wrong with this photo? Weren't Vancouver's D60s numbered 3XXX not 9XXX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
306 Carlton Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 Something does not look right here (Ottawa/Hull Members are Disqualified) I'm sorry but there appears to be nothing wrong with this picture! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George L. Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 Something does not look right here (Ottawa/Hull Members are Disqualified) There are two Stop Requested signs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCT-3122-D800-10240 Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 Weren't Vancouver's D60s numbered 3XXX not 9XXX Hmm... I guess you haven't checked out my website much yet. They were all originally delivered as 9001-9021 to PCTC when new in 1991 under the old style fleet numbering system. Nice try though! Next!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ttcgeek Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 There are two Stop Requested signs That's a norm on the newer VII NGs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G.A Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 Whats wrong with this one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George L. Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 Whats wrong with this one? Is it that MCI wannabe? That in itself is wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCT-3122-D800-10240 Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 Is it that MCI wannabe? That in itself is wrong Yes I would agree with you very much so! YEEESH! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SidneyTransitfan Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 What's wrong with this photo? It's BCTransit... but 9014 (I'm guessing renumbered to 3014), is not at it's allocated depot in the image - far from it! That's Victoria Transit Centre! I'd heard that Victoria tried out artics before bringing in the deckers - but I've never seen any evidence until now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCT-3122-D800-10240 Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 It's BCTransit... but 9014 (I'm guessing renumbered to 3014), is not at it's allocated depot in the image - far from it! That's Victoria Transit Centre!I'd heard that Victoria tried out artics before bringing in the deckers - but I've never seen any evidence until now! DING DING Diiiing..!! You got it! Excellent work! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George L. Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 What's wrong with this photo? This one is WAY too obvious... (It may not be wrong to some people, although it is to most of us...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexLy Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 What's wrong with this photo? This one is WAY too obvious... (It may not be wrong to some people, although it is to most of us...)http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4144/495073...ca7190065_z.jpg Side destination sign too far from the front door!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BusRider Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 What's wrong with this photo? This one is WAY too obvious... (It may not be wrong to some people, although it is to most of us...) Ad Placement FAIL? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George L. Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 Side destination sign too far from the front door!!! Correct This one's a little harder. For this one, people from the Los Angeles region are disqualified as you'd know instantly for one of the answers... These two photos are of the same kind of bus, but they are opposites in three different ways. For each difference, one is correct while the other is wrong. Two are somewhat obvious, but the 3rd one is a little tricky... Figure out what they are and which one is right/wrong Hints: -As noticed by StormTheif24, the first difference has to do with the placement of the ads, and it has to do with common sense itself... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormThief24 Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 Well, either the ad is supposed to cover up the "Commuter Express" like the one on the bottom, or it's not supposed to like the one on top, so it's a total crapshoot..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George L. Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 Well, either the ad is supposed to cover up the "Commuter Express" like the one on the bottom, or it's not supposed to like the one on top, so it's a total crapshoot..... It's not a crapshoot, that one is just based on common sense, so take a guess as to which is right/wrong I did say it would be a little hard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlarocque2005 Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 There are two Stop Requested signs Your on the right track. Though i found out from a Oc Transpo Co-op student 5001-5002 share this oddity that doesn't appear on 5003 and above . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VancouversLocalNerd Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 Anyone from Vancouver will know... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTC1700 Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 Anyone from Vancouver will know...http://img12.mediafire.com/b79a9946e02d47c...465af0b0e5g.jpg 311 isn't a trolley route. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VancouversLocalNerd Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 311 isn't a trolley route. Yep... was great, the driver looked first at the confused people at the bus stop, then toward us madly snapping photos... then up to his Luminator control and instantly developed an awesome "OH SH*T!!!!" look and changed it to 17 which is what it was supposed to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormThief24 Posted October 20, 2010 Report Share Posted October 20, 2010 This one's a little harder. For this one, people from the Los Angeles region are disqualified as you'd know instantly for one of the answers...These two photos are of the same kind of bus, but they are opposites in three different ways. For each difference, one is correct while the other is wrong. Two are somewhat obvious, but the 3rd one is a little tricky... Figure out what they are and which one is right/wrong Hints: -As noticed by StormTheif24, the first difference has to do with the placement of the ads, and it has to do with common sense itself... I'm going to guess that it's not supposed to cover up the "Commuter Express". (I can only guess because of TransLink's tendency to cover up the B-Line logo!) Also, remember, my username is the best example of "I before E except after C" This one is obvious but I thought it was a little funny so I decided to post it anyway. Click to enlarge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George L. Posted October 20, 2010 Report Share Posted October 20, 2010 I'm going to guess that it's not supposed to cover up the "Commuter Express". (I can only guess because of TransLink's tendency to cover up the B-Line logo!) Also, remember, my username is the best example of "I before E except after C" Yup, you got that one Since no other replies have come in about my last one, I might as well answer: -The side destination sign for the first one is off -The wheelchair lift door on the first one is lacking a blue accessible sign And I'll be sure to remember that (even though I'm the best speller among everyone I know) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VancouversLocalNerd Posted October 23, 2010 Report Share Posted October 23, 2010 This one is obvious but I thought it was a little funny so I decided to post it anyway. Click to enlarge. I'd like to say the inner right seat is wrong but I think that might be the original colour... all of them are faded except that one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. McConnell Posted October 23, 2010 Report Share Posted October 23, 2010 I'm going to guess that it's not supposed to cover up the "Commuter Express". LADOT covers up the "Commuter Express" text with ads all the time -- I honestly didn't think there was anything wrong with the photo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now