Michael Marriott Posted January 23, 2010 Report Share Posted January 23, 2010 54 on the 86 tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted January 23, 2010 Report Share Posted January 23, 2010 xCalgary #85 on the 302. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 xCalgary #82 on the 302 today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awstott Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Umm I thought Calgary had 4 digit fleet numbers... Wouldn't it be ETS 82 on the 302, which is an ex calgary unit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M. Parsons Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Umm I thought Calgary had 4 digit fleet numbers... Wouldn't it be ETS 82 on the 302, which is an ex calgary unit? Your way of writing it doesn't come off misleading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awstott Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Hey now.... I'm new to this sort of thing... I've only fanned in Edmonton before, and when they get painted all the same scheme it's hard to tell I just know it was confusing the way it was originally stated (TWICE) that I figured I should say something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Oh come on you two, Calgary's actually had a 6 digit fleet number...We know it's ETS 82 and it's ex-Calgary. If you really care about it's actual Calgary fleet, then use my handy conversion table In the greater scheme of things, does it really matter? @#$^%&*()!!!!!!!!!!!!! We are putting up with you guys and your stupid 10,000 different categories, so youcan put up with our info. you want to know what it was in Calgary, Get off your lazy but and Use your own conversion table! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awstott Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 How is having an Elf free shuttle thread, and a 2010 Elf thread any different than the 200 series D40LF thread and the 4000 series D40LF® thread? The Elf's days are numbered, so this should make it easier to track when one disappears. I don't understand the issue with having the threads broken up like this. It's worked perfectly fine for the year that I've been on the board with the other thread. I don't understand why it's so complicated for the shuttles..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 How is having an Elf free shuttle thread, and a 2010 Elf thread any different than the 200 series D40LF thread and the 4000 series D40LF® thread? The Elf's days are numbered, so this should make it easier to track when one disappears. I don't understand the issue with having the threads broken up like this. It's worked perfectly fine for the year that I've been on the board with the other thread. I don't understand why it's so complicated for the shuttles..... Probably because its a very very small fleet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M. Parsons Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 How is having an Elf free shuttle thread, and a 2010 Elf thread any different than the 200 series D40LF thread and the 4000 series D40LF® thread? The Elf's days are numbered, so this should make it easier to track when one disappears. I don't understand the issue with having the threads broken up like this. It's worked perfectly fine for the year that I've been on the board with the other thread. I don't understand why it's so complicated for the shuttles..... Indeed. New shuttles = New deliveries. Keeps that intel seperate from being assimilated with the rest. ELFs = as described above Everything else = self explanitory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M. Parsons Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Back on topic.... Noticed that one of the three Calgary ELF's by the tents is missing parts. Doors are gone and so is the front bumper. Those three probably don't have much time left until they get stripped completely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Marriott Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 85 on 308 90 on 322/323 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Board Admin A. Wong Posted January 25, 2010 Author Board Admin Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Michael Marriott reports 54 on driver training. 72 on 313. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T6H-5307N Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 88 on 309 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Board Admin A. Wong Posted January 26, 2010 Author Board Admin Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 70 on 181. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smelenchuk Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 72 on the 304 this AM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T6H-5307N Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 68 on 308, 70 on 309 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Board Admin A. Wong Posted January 27, 2010 Author Board Admin Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 I think it was 77 on the 313. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ec90 Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 56 on 327. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Board Admin A. Wong Posted January 27, 2010 Author Board Admin Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 77 on the 313. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smelenchuk Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 76 on the 304. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captaintrolley Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Mitchell and Ferrier ran out of available para equipment yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Board Admin A. Wong Posted January 29, 2010 Author Board Admin Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 77 on the 313 again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smelenchuk Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 78 on 304. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T6H-5307N Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 75 on 308 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now