Jump to content

Chris_the_traveller

Wiki Editor
  • Posts

    855
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Chris_the_traveller

  1. Transbus has the contract for the Casino shuttle and they only have NFI's when it comes to transit buses, so that's all you'll seen on that shuttle. As for 1237, that's one of the new 2014 XD40's only running on the shuttle with large Transbus logos on all 4 sides. I think you meant CITSV logos and not CITVR.

    Yes, corrected. thanks.

  2. Also: saw an ALP-45DP with 4 multilevels that had their destination signs set to "Direction Parc" laying over at CP Ballantyne. This is no doubt the Parc short turn run from St-Jerome. I am really having a hard time figuring out why the AMT would willingly make this train end its run at Parc. Perhaps CP is disallowing more trains on the Westmount Sub until the third track is done. Which would explain why construction of the third track has been underway for the past few months, andvwhy the project is moving along so rapidly.

  3. Rode train 112 (the Hudson train) into town this morning. About 20 people including myself got on at Hudson. It was a six-car trainset, and the horns were used to clear the several unprotected crossings. This was my first time boarding a train here.

  4. I have recently taken notice of the new generation of metro maps in the cars, which now make mention of the OACI addition to Square-Victoria. The signage has not yet changed at platform level. I wonder what they will do with the Guimard entrance. I hope that they will leave it as-is.

    The signage has changed, although I don't blame you if you missed it at the time you posted your message. They first changed one sign per platform. Then a few days later, they proceeded to change all the platform signage.

    BpGAXH2IcAAODcN.jpg

  5. and last but not least 31-141 with bike rack BUT not yet in function

    This whole bike rack business with the STM is such BS. They are placed on random routes and thus doomed to get that little red sticker by drivers who don't want to deal with them. There was virtually no PR campaign about them. And even if they had done a bit of PR to say that people could use them on the 715, 769, 34 or the Ahuntsic routes, no one would use them on those lines anyways. What a huge STM FAIL!

  6. Indeed. With metro station entrances for both orange and green lines one block away from René-Lévesque, either north or south, you are never too far from an east-west transit link. If it is a bus that you need, grab any pass (daily, tri-daily, weekend, weekly, bi-weekly, monthly, four-month and Train-Bus-Metro metropolitan passes ― no tickets, though) and hop on the 747 at any time of the day and night. René-Lévesques also sees a large amount of night routes, surpassed by few other streets in Montréal.

    Also worth mentioning the 15 only starts at 9am.

    Probably a question of space for idle vehicles, although I agree they could have sent routes 30/715/747 stops on the southeast corner of Berri/Sainte-Catherine.

    Also mainly so that they can continue straight on Ste-Catherine St. direction métro Papineau.

  7. At a recent public meeting, STM vice president Marvin Rotrand declared articulated buses wouldn't be able to turn around at Elmhurst Terminus. This is apparently stalling the integration of these buses onto the 105 route.

    Sounds like bs to me! With all due respect, this wouldn't be the first time this councillor has made up facts. Can anyone confirm/deny that the artics would not be able to take the curve?

×
×
  • Create New...