User talk:OC 8208

Hello all...

Timmins Transit

While going over Timmins Transit I noticed you had it filled with HTML code. This is not needed and makes it hard for others to edit should they choose to do so. D40LF 21:00, 27 June 2007 (PDT)

Due to your chronic reverts I have placed a temporary block on Timmins Transit. If you have an issue please post it on the CPTDB_Wiki:Administrators'_Noticeboard page. D40LF 06:21, 13 November 2007 (PST)

I have Emailed The owner of the board Indticating this treatment about your Chronic Reverts as well!

You need to understand that I am a moderator and as such as here to enforce the rules, which your are violating with your reverts. As I already stated I have made a mod decision regarding this page and until you provide proof that decision stands. D40LF 06:28, 13 November 2007 (PST)

Please Stop Discussing this with me until Ashton has a chance to review this thank you. OC 8208 06:30, 13 November 2007 (PST)

Sorry but as a moderator I have every right to discuss this with you. First since you brought this up in the first place and someone went with it then this is your own fault. Second if you notice the table I mentioned that this bus maybe numbered 89, but that in the column the bus is numbered with a question mark '?'. As I have already stated elsewhere if you can prove this bus doesn't exist then I will remove i. D40LF 06:37, 13 November 2007 (PST)

You got info from the Timmins Transit thread right... I am the person who made the claim, Since I am the one who made the claim... shouldn't you find someone to back up my claim before you decide to use my claim if I didn't use it on the Timmins Transit Page in the wiki?OC 8208 06:40, 13 November 2007 (PST)

Or perhaps you shouldn't post false information, if it is false that is. D40LF 06:44, 13 November 2007 (PST)

the rules state thats where you put info that is not been validated or is rumors THATS why i left it off the wiki! Why do you think I have been fighting to keep it off the wiki? Its only a rumor that its been given 89 even tho i saw it... people last year saw 86 and 87 and 88 as New Nova's in the Same location as I saw the bus... But since i have no pictures to back me up its just a rumor!OC 8208 06:48, 13 November 2007 (PST)

And if you notice I mentioned it maybe numbered 89

Fleet Number Range	Thumbnail	Year	Manufacturer	Model Number	Engine	Transmission	Notes
?		2003	Thomas	SLF-235			Powered by a Mercedes Benz engine. Ex-Demo unit Maybe numbered 89

D40LF 06:52, 13 November 2007 (PST)

But its STILL a rumor, So it has no place on the wiki OC 8208 06:54, 13 November 2007 (PST) and i have yet to see where any other wiki page gets the honor of a buses not in service section OC 8208 07:15, 13 November 2007 (PST)

Blanking User Talk page

Please do not blank your user talk page. This is frowned upon on wikis as bad form, especially when the notes are from moderators.D40LF 06:17, 13 November 2007 (PST)

Please Be Advised

Please Be advised I have put in a Complaint about your actions with heresay on the Timmins Transit page with The board Owner.

By all means feel free to bring this up with Ashton. If you can prove that this bus doesn't exist then it should be removed. However as another person states the bus is there then there is a conflict. I am acting as a Wiki Moderator here, and in that capacity have made a decision which you need to respect. Once you can prove to me that bus doesn't exist then I will remove the section. Until that time do not revert the page or I will ask to have you banned from the Wiki. D40LF 06:24, 13 November 2007 (PST)

Image:Dalton Luke

Interesting photograph, always happy to see old shots like that. However just to let you know that the image was uploaded with an incorrect file name, as per naming conventions. Can you please upload the image with a correct title, ie Image:Dalton Bus Lines 57-a.JPG. Thankyou. D40LF 09:33, 22 November 2007 (PST)

is it possible to use the name Dalton Bus Lines 57-aLuke.JPG as its owned by Mr.Luke? OC 8208 09:35, 22 November 2007 (PST)