User talk:NewFlyerD40: Difference between revisions

From CPTDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:


I would say that the 28 move was done incorrectly - someone just created a new page without redirecting the old page (and this was well before my time as a Moderator). So I guess you're assuming because one thing had been done wrong in the past, you can continue to do wrong things in the future? I would strongly prefer to avoid having duplicate pages. The other pages were moved properly, so please keep them as they are. --'''''[[User:Articulated|<font color="#000099">Articulated</font>]]'''''<sup>[[User talk:Articulated|Talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Articulated|Contrib]]</sub> 03:20, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
I would say that the 28 move was done incorrectly - someone just created a new page without redirecting the old page (and this was well before my time as a Moderator). So I guess you're assuming because one thing had been done wrong in the past, you can continue to do wrong things in the future? I would strongly prefer to avoid having duplicate pages. The other pages were moved properly, so please keep them as they are. --'''''[[User:Articulated|<font color="#000099">Articulated</font>]]'''''<sup>[[User talk:Articulated|Talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Articulated|Contrib]]</sub> 03:20, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
== BC Transit 505/5505 ==
I see the filename changed on the photo of prevost 505/5505.  The original filename was technically correct, as the actual photo was taken after the bus was retired from active duty, and officially renumbered to 505 in its new role as a hoist test bus.

Revision as of 20:19, 24 May 2021

TTC 7900-7979 build dates

Hello, I was wondering where you got the build dates for these buses from? I checked a couple of the buses and they do not match the builder's sticker. --8050 (talk) 20:54, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Renamed TTC route pages

Hi there, please do not recreate TTC route pages that were moved to reflect routes that were renamed due to the opening of the Line 1 extension to Vaughan. By undoing the redirect, it now creates duplicate pages that do not reflect the full history of the route, especially when you are actively removing portions of the History section from the current route pages. --ArticulatedTalkContrib 00:54, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi. I don't know why that would be a problem since within the History of the new renamed route, I am referring to the old route page with the continued history. If those aren't allowed to be recreated, then why was 28 Davisville and 28 Bayview South pages allowed to go through considering that they both referenced each other as being a renamed route? --NewFlyerD40 (talk) 02:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

I would say that the 28 move was done incorrectly - someone just created a new page without redirecting the old page (and this was well before my time as a Moderator). So I guess you're assuming because one thing had been done wrong in the past, you can continue to do wrong things in the future? I would strongly prefer to avoid having duplicate pages. The other pages were moved properly, so please keep them as they are. --ArticulatedTalkContrib 03:20, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

BC Transit 505/5505

I see the filename changed on the photo of prevost 505/5505. The original filename was technically correct, as the actual photo was taken after the bus was retired from active duty, and officially renumbered to 505 in its new role as a hoist test bus.