TRANSIT_FREAK Report post Posted September 2, 2010 Take a look at the side destination sign The 12 does not even go to Gulph Mills and the 12 does not use 30ft buses I've even had my own destination signs mess up on me! Don't ask me how it happened! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
George L. Report post Posted September 19, 2010 Malfunctioning TwinVision headsign: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
George L. Report post Posted October 7, 2010 So I photographed the same Foothill Transit Orion V again, they fixed the headsign, but half the route number is still missing... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cmc12 Report post Posted October 27, 2010 Front says '03 GO Station' Side says 'Milliken' Front paper sign says '86' Side paper sign says '41 Markham' You tell me which route it's on Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DE40LFR Report post Posted October 28, 2010 This is VERY misleading and confusing! The first part of the destination sign isn't there! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
George L. Report post Posted November 9, 2010 ANOTHER Foothill Transit Orion V destination sign fail: Sign is supposed to read: "686 ROSE BOWL" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VancouversLocalNerd Report post Posted December 24, 2010 TransLink's infamous "CHK/MW" glitch on steroids... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CR SD40-2 Report post Posted December 24, 2010 As long as I hve owened a digital camera this has never happened to me were I would get two signs shared together but......It's supposed to say THE LOOP,BETHLEHEM,GUETTER & BROAD Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tmx218 Report post Posted December 24, 2010 Back from my bus fanning days... Classic fail of the old Balios LED signs. Got photos of two Calgary Transit buses missing their signs completely because of bad LED's and were awaiting replacement parts... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VancouversLocalNerd Report post Posted December 28, 2010 Where exactly is ">>21 NH 1E ROCK CTR"? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ilikebuses Report post Posted March 13, 2011 This place hasn't been posted in a while... Are all the destination signs all fixed? Nope! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Puget Sound Rider Report post Posted March 16, 2011 I have two things here. 1) I seem to have this happen when attempting to get photos of LED signs: Sound Transit LINK 110 by zargoman, on Flickr And there was this one: King County Metro 2009 New Flyer DE60LFA 6002 by zargoman, on Flickr Both of these signs were completely fine when I took the photos, but the camera didn't agree with them for some reason. I've had the same happen in the past with LED tail lights. Another complete FAIL that was done either by New Flyer or King County Metro is this: 6081? I think not by zargoman, on Flickr There is no such thing as coach 6081 in Metro's fleet. Their DE60LFAs are currently 6000-6020. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PCC Guy Report post Posted December 29, 2011 Bumping this post with a few older fails from the TTC... Screwed up RTS - http://www.majhost.c...ls/img_0543.jpg Screwed up D40LF - http://www.majhost.c...ls/dsc00663.jpg An a video of an offset New Look sign, which used to be somewhat common. At the very start of the idea, the sign reads "52 Lawrence We" http://www.youtube.c...h?v=kNFilxq0AOQ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Volvo Super Olympian Report post Posted December 30, 2011 lol rebel RTS.. he's F'in service Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
septa_kid Report post Posted January 11, 2012 Where is Whitman Iarket Street??!? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ttc9426 Report post Posted January 23, 2012 Caught in the middle of a changing sign Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Matt Demers Report post Posted January 23, 2012 A photo of a changing destination sign at night does not classify as fail.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vivablue5215 Report post Posted January 23, 2012 A photo of a changing destination sign at night does not classify as fail.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ttc9426 Report post Posted January 23, 2012 A photo of a changing destination sign at night does not classify as fail.... Why do you even care? Either way it's (kind of) a sign fail to me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vivablue5215 Report post Posted January 28, 2012 Looks like the destination sign isn't working. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Transit Man Report post Posted January 28, 2012 A photo of a changing destination sign at night does not classify as fail.... Unless it was in the process of changing and jammed, staying that way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Around the Horn Report post Posted September 21, 2013 Nuff said Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
George L. Report post Posted October 15, 2013 Front reads NOT IN SERVICE while side reads OUT OF SERVICE Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
