Jump to content

CPTDB Wiki was recently upgraded! Please report any issues here.

eclair14

Destination sign FAIL !

Recommended Posts

5516-4.jpg

2099-12.jpg

4578-6.jpg

5595-2.jpg

5223.jpg

jun8th2009048.jpg

Take a look at the side destination sign

5787.jpg

The 12 does not even go to Gulph Mills and the 12 does not use 30ft buses

4537-3.jpg

I've even had my own destination signs mess up on me! Don't ask me how it happened! :P

7101ANIRE.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I photographed the same Foothill Transit Orion V again, they fixed the headsign, but half the route number is still missing...

5058441267_33b0c21159_z.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Front says '03 GO Station'

Side says 'Milliken'

Front paper sign says '86'

Side paper sign says '41 Markham'

You tell me which route it's on :P

2067.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as I hve owened a digital camera this has never happened to me were I would get two signs shared together but......It's supposed to say THE LOOP,BETHLEHEM,GUETTER & BROAD

IMG_5347.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Back from my bus fanning days... Classic fail of the old Balios LED signs. Got photos of two Calgary Transit buses missing their signs completely because of bad LED's and were awaiting replacement parts...

7814.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have two things here.

1) I seem to have this happen when attempting to get photos of LED signs:

5528525682_de75c1dce4_m.jpg

Sound Transit LINK 110 by zargoman, on Flickr

And there was this one:

5531585030_1b99849a68_m.jpg

King County Metro 2009 New Flyer DE60LFA 6002 by zargoman, on Flickr

Both of these signs were completely fine when I took the photos, but the camera didn't agree with them for some reason. I've had the same happen in the past with LED tail lights.

Another complete FAIL that was done either by New Flyer or King County Metro is this:

5493240728_b4ca6be6ca_m.jpg

6081? I think not by zargoman, on Flickr

There is no such thing as coach 6081 in Metro's fleet. Their DE60LFAs are currently 6000-6020.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bumping this post with a few older fails from the TTC... :P

Screwed up RTS -

http://www.majhost.c...ls/img_0543.jpg

Screwed up D40LF -

http://www.majhost.c...ls/dsc00663.jpg

An a video of an offset New Look sign, which used to be somewhat common. At the very start of the idea, the sign reads "52 Lawrence We"

http://www.youtube.c...h?v=kNFilxq0AOQ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A photo of a changing destination sign at night does not classify as fail.... <_<

Why do you even care? Either way it's (kind of) a sign fail to me. :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...