Jump to content

Streetcar News


CLRV4037
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, lip said:

I'll give people another funny story as to how the TTC cant do anything properly. When the TTC closed down the Queensway ROW for reconstruction about 5 years ago (which at that time, streetcar service was suspended on/off so many times between 2010-2017 I've honestly lost count), the closure went on for longer then expected and the resumption of service was delayed due to an apparent water table issue. Now we would think that the TTC had time to properly inspect every inch of track work before they opened the ROW right? Apparently not because couple months later, they put in a ~5km/h speed restriction east of the Humber Loop portal because of a track defect. Fast forward to 2022 now that streetcar service has been suspended again on the 501 since 2020, logically speaking you would think the TTC would take the opportunity to fix the track defect right? Well unfortunately management doesnt really think logically at the TTC, so what's probably going to happen is that once the 501 finally resumes service, they'll shut down the line again to fix the defect that shouldve already been fixed.

Too many of their people are just snoozing at the wheel and the people at the top are too stupid to know it when they see it. Hell they might be sleeping next to them on the office lounge couch. They get these huge windows to do what work that needs doing without ******* over customers and they wait for the windows to slam shut before trying to pry them open again. It's like they don't care one bit about how crappy the experience is for customers when they have to suffer their incompetence.

Seriously, about the only thing botched even worse than Bombardier's LRV building program is the TTC's overhead conversion program. They had all the time in the world to convert overhead on Kingston Road when it was all buses a few years ago but they did f all with that time!! I watched last summer day after day, week after week, the junctions at Queen and Church/Victoria stood abandoned with no activity until I finally saw crews putting up wires at like 2am late in the year. I even forgot about Dundas that they had half converted and half not converted which cancelled their plans to bring back the streetcars. How can they keep forgetting about these things?

3 hours ago, T3G said:

The whole implementation of the door requests has been quite a mess. What is the point of having those buttons in the streetcars in the first place if they're just going to open all the doors at every stop anyway? Nothing like being on the car in the dead of winter and stopping to pick up one person and throwing all the doors open, especially when you're sitting right next to a door.

Thanks for reminding me about that. This is another one of those TTC things they dropped the ball on. They got Andy Byford to parade around in one of those videos to show us plebs how to use the buttons but when they sent the streetcars out into the streets they never even tried to run them like that. I would say far far less than 5% of crews will put the things in button operated mode. The other 95% will do things by the book and open all of the doors in white out conditions at every single stop. It's straight up pain that never ends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stuff like this almost makes it sound like Rob Ford was right and we should have just sold off all of our streetcars for articulated buses.

Being on rails, streetcars are supposed to be faster, transport larger volumes of people, and ultimately be more reliable since it's steel wheels on rails. Not only are buses not limited by speed/intersection restrictions, but they are currently more accessible by picking up people directly at the curb. Buses running replacement service are not supposed to be a blessing but it sure starting to sound like it is.

I'm hoping things are figured out soon since I do think streetcars, when optimized properly are better, but at the rate it's going it sounds like it will get worse before it gets better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The switch control problems are really the worst, and the TTC has been putting off replacing the switch electronics for what seems like 10 years. Didn't the TTC go as far as to get reverse engineered clones made of the old electronics because the original supplier (ITT/Lorenz?) no longer exists? It seems like even old school power on/off controls would be better at this point.

And I'm surprised Tory didn't fire Rick Leary after the incident in the subway in early 2020.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, IRT_BMT_IND said:

And I'm surprised Tory didn't fire Rick Leary after the incident in the subway in early 2020.

John Tory represents status quo, he wont change a lick of anything unless his hand is forced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

If it's been discussed here I've missed it....there are two steps to the pantograph-ization of the overhead. Lake Shore Blvd. had the suspension cable installed for pantographs years ago. But now they're putting in the bars that offset the overhead side to side. Westbound, this conversion has made it to about Long Branch Ave.

I'm also waiting to see what the replacement specialwork at Kipling and Lake Shore looks like. Will the mystery east-to-north curve vanish? It seems to have been there from at least the second world war. I don't know if it was like that when Lake Shore was double-tracked. Maybe TTC '28 has some info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ed T. said:

If it's been discussed here I've missed it....there are two steps to the pantograph-ization of the overhead. Lake Shore Blvd. had the suspension cable installed for pantographs years ago. But now they're putting in the bars that offset the overhead side to side. Westbound, this conversion has made it to about Long Branch Ave.

I'm also waiting to see what the replacement specialwork at Kipling and Lake Shore looks like. Will the mystery east-to-north curve vanish? It seems to have been there from at least the second world war. I don't know if it was like that when Lake Shore was double-tracked. Maybe TTC '28 has some info.

I don't think it's long enough to fit the new cars.  However Obico yard may house a new barn so maybe they will make use of that stub track. 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shaun said:

I don't think it's long enough to fit the new cars.  However Obico yard may house a new barn so maybe they will make use of that stub track. 

No one was talking about the stub track. Since you mention it, however, its length is 136 feet from junction to end. It's less than that if you want to ensure the car does not block another vehicle's access into the loop, but it should be plenty enough to fit a Flexity car, and this is clearly viewable if you look at it on Google Streetview, too.

This is all a moot point, though, as the track is not connected electrically to the network and I know of no plans to change this.

2 hours ago, Ed T. said:

It seems to have been there from at least the second world war. I don't know if it was like that when Lake Shore was double-tracked. Maybe TTC '28 has some info.

TTC '28 does not make any reference to the east to north curve track. Its only track diagram is dated to February 1928, prior to the TTC takeover of the Lakeshore track, so that is also out. The earliest reference I have found to it is in the foldout track diagrams that come with 50 Years of Progressive Transit - according to that, the track has been there since at least May 1, 1936.

Personally, despite the low probability of it needing to be used, I think that intentionally handicapping yourself by omitting a curve wouldn't make much sense from an operation's perspective. This is my theory as to why the west to north curve at Queen and Kingston Road exists. Better to have it and not need it, than to need it and not have it, and all that.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/17/2022 at 4:13 PM, Shaun said:

However Obico yard may house a new barn ...

I hadn't heard that - is that for real?

If so, they'd have most of the 44 Kipling South route covered! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, nfitz said:

I hadn't heard that - is that for real?

If so, they'd have most of the 44 Kipling South route covered! :)

Don't believe everything you read on the Internet.

 

Dan

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's funny, i came here to ask about the track extending north from Kipling Loop after watching a video of the 44 Kipling South. It seems to be one of the weirdest pieces of mystery track. The ones on Kingston east of Bingham and the tracks on Neville Park Blvd are ones we at least know the history behind. This one is strange though. On the subject of a barn/carhouse. Even if a carhouse was constructed at the Obico yard, i find it strange to do so as it would only connect to and be used by the long branch route. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, lifty4ever said:

It's funny, i came here to ask about the track extending north from Kipling Loop after watching a video of the 44 Kipling South. It seems to be one of the weirdest pieces of mystery track. The ones on Kingston east of Bingham and the tracks on Neville Park Blvd are ones we at least know the history behind. This one is strange though. On the subject of a barn/carhouse. Even if a carhouse was constructed at the Obico yard, i find it strange to do so as it would only connect to and be used by the long branch route. 

There are potentials, maybe 50 years down the road

Queensway streetcar, Islington South car, Royal York South car, Waterfront west LRT streetcar, Sherway LRT (instead of subway) and even a northly extension to the airport via the hydro corridor.

All brought to you by the Etobicoke Streetcar Admiration Society. Current membership - ZERO!

Jokes aside, this is the only area left where they can build a large carhouse. It doesn't have to be at Obico but closer to Kipling/Horner or beside the detention centre. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Xtrazsteve said:

Jokes aside, this is the only area left where they can build a large carhouse. It doesn't have to be at Obico but closer to Kipling/Horner or beside the detention centre. 

Given how frequently there seems to be some construction issue west of Roncesvalles - I don't really see this as an option.

There's still lots of other options, if you are creative. Move some of the bus facilities at Hillcrest elsewhere, and you can build a full scale yard there (and I thought they were leaning that way).

Start going vertically. Deck over Greenwood yard, and put a streetcar yard on top (though track access would be difficult); then develop above that to pay the cost for the whole thing. Buy Dufferin Mall (surely it will be redeveloped some day), dig down for a yard, and redevelop on top of it. Might even make a profit on that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nfitz said:

Given how frequently there seems to be some construction issue west of Roncesvalles - I don't really see this as an option.

There's still lots of other options, if you are creative. Move some of the bus facilities at Hillcrest elsewhere, and you can build a full scale yard there (and I thought they were leaning that way).

Start going vertically. Deck over Greenwood yard, and put a streetcar yard on top (though track access would be difficult); then develop above that to pay the cost for the whole thing. Buy Dufferin Mall (surely it will be redeveloped some day), dig down for a yard, and redevelop on top of it. Might even make a profit on that one.

Why not Gerrard Square since you mentioned Dufferin Mall?

These are the only 2 malls within the old City of Toronto afterall (besides Eaton Centre which won't be moving anytime soon).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, nfitz said:

Given how frequently there seems to be some construction issue west of Roncesvalles - I don't really see this as an option.

There's still lots of other options, if you are creative. Move some of the bus facilities at Hillcrest elsewhere, and you can build a full scale yard there (and I thought they were leaning that way).

Start going vertically. Deck over Greenwood yard, and put a streetcar yard on top (though track access would be difficult); then develop above that to pay the cost for the whole thing. Buy Dufferin Mall (surely it will be redeveloped some day), dig down for a yard, and redevelop on top of it. Might even make a profit on that one.

I suppose if they ever get the Waterfront West LRT done, there will be an alternative track west of Roncy. Humber River crossing remains a problem but they could built a new crossing and keep tracks entirely on Lake Shore. There would be access to the regular network at Dufferin Gates, Bathurst, Queens Quay, Spadina and into East Bayfront/Portlands. The only real problem is the location is too far from the network for routes like Bathurst, Spadina, Dundas and Carlton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, lifty4ever said:

It's funny, i came here to ask about the track extending north from Kipling Loop after watching a video of the 44 Kipling South. It seems to be one of the weirdest pieces of mystery track. The ones on Kingston east of Bingham and the tracks on Neville Park Blvd are ones we at least know the history behind. This one is strange though. On the subject of a barn/carhouse. Even if a carhouse was constructed at the Obico yard, i find it strange to do so as it would only connect to and be used by the long branch route. 

Virtually all loops used to have a tail track - that is, a short section of track that dead-ended and was connected by a switch to the main trackage - that allowed the TTC (and its predecessors) to store a car out of the way of regular service.

 

That's all this stretch of track is.

 

Dan

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/21/2022 at 6:39 PM, Orion V said:

Why not Gerrard Square since you mentioned Dufferin Mall?

These are the only 2 malls within the old City of Toronto afterall (besides Eaton Centre which won't be moving anytime soon).

That's a good thought!

I have no doubt that Gerrard Square will be redeveloped in the next decade or two with the new subway station to be built there. Though it may be a bit on the small side. But if they only use it for storage, it might work! And more central than other locations - assuming they develop on top of it!

 

18 hours ago, Xtrazsteve said:

I suppose if they ever get the Waterfront West LRT done, there will be an alternative track west of Roncy. Humber River crossing remains a problem but they could built a new crossing and keep tracks entirely on Lake Shore. There would be access to the regular network at Dufferin Gates, Bathurst, Queens Quay, Spadina and into East Bayfront/Portlands. The only real problem is the location is too far from the network for routes like Bathurst, Spadina, Dundas and Carlton.

I thought the Waterfront West LRT was supposed to join the Queensway, somewhere between the Humber and Roncesvalles.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nfitz said:

I thought the Waterfront West LRT was supposed to join the Queensway, somewhere between the Humber and Roncesvalles.

 

Yes with the current “cheap” plans. I was just fantasizing. It would be nice if they actually made waterfront LRT faster instead of cheaper by lumping it through the Humber Loop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/22/2022 at 9:55 PM, Xtrazsteve said:

Yes with the current “cheap” plans. I was just fantasizing. It would be nice if they actually made waterfront LRT faster instead of cheaper by lumping it through the Humber Loop.

What makes Humber loop so slow? The travel times and speed are excellent on the grade-separated 2.5 km stretch from east of Parkside to Humber Loop.

How would fixing whatever that issue is, be more expensive than building a new ROW (on the south? where would it fit?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking forward to the new idiotic SOP the clowns at management will come up with for this one. Who knows maybe it's going to be slowing down streetcars to 10km/h at every non-signalized intersection, or a stop-and-proceed when in close proximity to a garbage truck.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Kelvin3157 said:

Looks like 4568 knocked over a dump truck

 

It’s appears to have been a Wasteco truck.

I’m speculating, but the operator was probably reversing, and relying on a rear view camera, which wouldn’t pick up an approaching streetcar out of frame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bus_Medic said:

It’s appears to have been a Wasteco truck.

I’m speculating, but the operator was probably reversing, and relying on a rear view camera, which wouldn’t pick up an approaching streetcar out of frame.

You are correct. It was a  Wasteco truck. Coincidentally they are hiring.

IMG_20220726_000315__01.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Bus_Medic said:

It’s appears to have been a Wasteco truck.

I’m speculating, but the operator was probably reversing, and relying on a rear view camera, which wouldn’t pick up an approaching streetcar out of frame.

Or the curb apparently. Time to put bollards along the streetcar tracks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...