Bus_Medic Posted January 22, 2020 Report Share Posted January 22, 2020 I’m speculating undiagnosed dementia was at play here. 16 minutes ago, nfitz said: Either way ... perhaps a trench or trap or something just past the gate might be in order, if only to make the retrieval of the vehicle easier! The potential lethality of such a device would scare off the legal department. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smallspy Posted January 22, 2020 Report Share Posted January 22, 2020 15 minutes ago, nfitz said: Either way ... perhaps a trench or trap or something just past the gate might be in order, if only to make the retrieval of the vehicle easier! There is already a trench at the bottom of the ramp, as there has been since the last track reconstruction of 10 or so years ago. Apparently that still isn't enough to stop the vehicles. Dan 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
63 Ossington Posted January 22, 2020 Report Share Posted January 22, 2020 Also, apparently the person got past the lifting gate by following a streetcar through before the gate could reset. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xtrazsteve Posted January 23, 2020 Report Share Posted January 23, 2020 5 hours ago, nfitz said: I can see how once you are in, that you end up down there. Though I'd have thought the gates, etc., would have put a stop to this (though it's surely reduced it). This seems to not have been alcohol related ... but the driver may have had medical issues. Either way ... perhaps a trench or trap or something just past the gate might be in order, if only to make the retrieval of the vehicle easier! They just need to install something like Calgary did: https://www.google.com/maps/@51.0462824,-114.0555898,3a,42.5y,273.57h,93.49t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s5J5PZmcIZy4-4JiNcxvm7Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 Alternatively they shouldn't install any traps which could allow any cars to be able to drive out safely. Have a camera to take a picture and send them a ticket. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Oke Posted January 23, 2020 Report Share Posted January 23, 2020 24 minutes ago, Xtrazsteve said: Alternatively they shouldn't install any traps which could allow any cars to be able to drive out safely. Have a camera to take a picture and send them a ticket. The most simple and easy solution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaun Posted January 23, 2020 Report Share Posted January 23, 2020 44 minutes ago, Xtrazsteve said: They just need to install something like Calgary did: https://www.google.com/maps/@51.0462824,-114.0555898,3a,42.5y,273.57h,93.49t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s5J5PZmcIZy4-4JiNcxvm7Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 Alternatively they shouldn't install any traps which could allow any cars to be able to drive out safely. Have a camera to take a picture and send them a ticket. Never mind getting a ticket, they need to have their car lifted by a special machine to get out. So it's not like you can just turn around and leave. Besides it's almost 2km from that entrance to the Union platform. If you haven't figured out that there is something wrong by the time you got there, you do not deserve your license. Especially if you did it on purpose. Plus odds are your car is destroyed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bus_Medic Posted January 23, 2020 Report Share Posted January 23, 2020 11 hours ago, John Oke said: The most simple and easy solution Then we’re back to square one. Disabled vehicles stuck blocking service because of yet another neat-o contraption that 3 sunshine list engineers had to sign off on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lip Posted January 24, 2020 Report Share Posted January 24, 2020 The solution is easy, install retractable bollards. It doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure out a solution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xtrazsteve Posted January 24, 2020 Report Share Posted January 24, 2020 14 minutes ago, lip said: The solution is easy, install retractable bollards. It doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure out a solution. As the driver follows the streetcar, the streetcar passes and the bollard rises. The car gets struck by the bollard and is raised into the air. The driver gets injured along with a disabled car. A 3 hour collision investigation occurs. Afterwards the injured driver sues the TTC. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lip Posted January 24, 2020 Report Share Posted January 24, 2020 ^And the TTC could make the case that there are numerous warnings that give said driver advanced warning not to enter the tunnel, and thus due to the driver's own negligence they ended up in the situation that they got themselves into. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xtrazsteve Posted January 24, 2020 Report Share Posted January 24, 2020 25 minutes ago, lip said: ^And the TTC could make the case that there are numerous warnings that give said driver advanced warning not to enter the tunnel, and thus due to the driver's own negligence they ended up in the situation that they got themselves into. TTC never liked the idea of having the eastbound lane north of the tracks. Along with the lack of signage adds to the confusion. Especially for people unfamiliar to Queens Quay. A lot of people end up on the streetcar lane cause they can't find the eastbound lane south of the track and only realize it after starting the turn. Some, like this driver never realize they are on the streetcar lane or is totally confused where he should be driving. It's dark and they don't see the signs. You don't see people ended up in Spadina Station for this reason and this usually happens at night time. Sometimes I think we need to take a step back and look at why drivers are ending up in there. Some of them are just confused out of town people ending up in the wrong place due to terribly designed roads. The city might need to ban south to eastbound turns onto Queens Quay or convert QQ to westbound only all together. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaun Posted January 24, 2020 Report Share Posted January 24, 2020 7 hours ago, Xtrazsteve said: TTC never liked the idea of having the eastbound lane north of the tracks. Along with the lack of signage adds to the confusion. Especially for people unfamiliar to Queens Quay. A lot of people end up on the streetcar lane cause they can't find the eastbound lane south of the track and only realize it after starting the turn. Some, like this driver never realize they are on the streetcar lane or is totally confused where he should be driving. It's dark and they don't see the signs. You don't see people ended up in Spadina Station for this reason and this usually happens at night time. Sometimes I think we need to take a step back and look at why drivers are ending up in there. Some of them are just confused out of town people ending up in the wrong place due to terribly designed roads. The city might need to ban south to eastbound turns onto Queens Quay or convert QQ to westbound only all together. But when the "Road" runs out underneath them you would think that they would turn around instead keep going for another 1.5km's and total their car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drum118 Posted January 24, 2020 Report Share Posted January 24, 2020 Waterfront East LRT Design Update Dear Public and Stakeholders, As you may recall, in January 2018, City Council endorsed an overall Waterfront Transit Network Plan for the City, including identification of priority segments. In April 2019, City Council endorsed the streetcar loop expansion at Union Station as the preferred option for the Union Queens Quay Link, and directed staff to commence the preliminary design and engineering phase of the extension of light rail transit to the East Bayfront beginning in 2020. Preliminary design and engineering work will shortly be underway for the Waterfront East LRT, a priority segment for the waterfront transit network. The City, in partnership with TTC, and Waterfront Toronto staff are currently focused on feasibility assessments for the Waterfront East LRT including: An alternative portal location for the LRT along Queens Quay between Bay Street and Yonge Street, which may provide overall cost and public realm benefits Consideration of phasing option(s) that may expedite the east-west streetcar service on Queen's Quay to the East Bayfront Public consultation and engagement regarding the Waterfront East LRT alternate portal assessment, potential phasing options, and a preliminary design update is currently being planned and is expected in early spring 2020. Further details will be provided over the next few weeks. You can learn more about the City's waterfront transit network plan including Waterfront East and other priority sections by visiting: www.toronto.ca/waterfronttransit Kind regards, The Waterfront East LRT Team 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfitz Posted January 24, 2020 Report Share Posted January 24, 2020 It would be more useful to link to where this information was, rather than just copying and pasting it without context! Do you have the link? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drum118 Posted January 24, 2020 Report Share Posted January 24, 2020 19 minutes ago, nfitz said: It would be more useful to link to where this information was, rather than just copying and pasting it without context! Do you have the link? Nope.... It was sent to me since I am a stakeholder and been on the team since 2004 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xtrazsteve Posted January 24, 2020 Report Share Posted January 24, 2020 4 hours ago, Shaun said: But when the "Road" runs out underneath them you would think that they would turn around instead keep going for another 1.5km's and total their car. Please enlighten me on how you can do that? There's no place to U turn once they end up past the ramp. There are centre columns through the tunnel between the two directions. The only thing they could do is keep going or reverse. It'll be pretty hard to do if they try reversing on the curve leading to Queens Quay Station. Driving onto the Queens Quay platform to make a million point turn is not possible without popping the tires. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfitz Posted January 24, 2020 Report Share Posted January 24, 2020 2 hours ago, drum118 said: Nope.... It was sent to me since I am a stakeholder and been on the team since 2004 Or providing that context! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drum118 Posted January 24, 2020 Report Share Posted January 24, 2020 5 hours ago, nfitz said: Or providing that context! You got what I got. The study underway by the City is looking at the cost of building an new east entrance for the Westin Hotel off Yonge St extension that will be built over the Current Yonge Slip. This cost will be compare to cost of the Tunnel from Bay to Freeland. Westin will pay for some of the new entrance and will close the current entrance. If the cost is less than the tunnel, then the Freeland Portal will be move from Freeland to the west side of Yonge that will speed up rebuilding QQE like the west. It will also allow the extension to connect to the West section sooner than later to allow a short shut down on 509/510 while the Tunnels and new loop is being built. Also, there a thought the new QQE Station would be be around the operating line underground at Bay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfitz Posted January 25, 2020 Report Share Posted January 25, 2020 2 hours ago, drum118 said: You got what I got. In terms of context? No. You knew who it was from, how it was sent, etc. All we got was cut-and-paste without the necessary context. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drum118 Posted January 25, 2020 Report Share Posted January 25, 2020 41 minutes ago, nfitz said: In terms of context? No. You knew who it was from, how it was sent, etc. All we got was cut-and-paste without the necessary context. Take a hike as I don't post info of people or how things arrive that has no need to be here in the first place. Don't like it, that your problem...Move on 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
63 Ossington Posted January 25, 2020 Report Share Posted January 25, 2020 Has anyone noticed Flexity doors closing very slowly? Normally it has the fast close (with the bang) to the 3/4 mark then slow close the last bit. I noticed today both cars I was on had the slow closing movement the whole way, and without the bang. Both were 44XX units. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfitz Posted January 25, 2020 Report Share Posted January 25, 2020 11 hours ago, drum118 said: Take a hike as I don't post info of people or how things arrive that has no need to be here in the first place. Don't like it, that your problem...Move on That's the problem though - all you have to do is say "from the TTC mailing list" or something. There's no need to be rude here. Please be civil. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ngdvd Posted January 25, 2020 Report Share Posted January 25, 2020 14 hours ago, drum118 said: Take a hike as I don't post info of people or how things arrive that has no need to be here in the first place. Don't like it, that your problem...Move on Just ignore whiners like Nfitz. We appreciate you posting the info here. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T3G Posted January 25, 2020 Report Share Posted January 25, 2020 Heaven forbid people should cite where they get their information from. 7 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bus_7246 Posted January 26, 2020 Report Share Posted January 26, 2020 19 hours ago, 63 Ossington said: Has anyone noticed Flexity doors closing very slowly? Normally it has the fast close (with the bang) to the 3/4 mark then slow close the last bit. I noticed today both cars I was on had the slow closing movement the whole way, and without the bang. Both were 44XX units. This is a new update to the low floor door operators program so that ‘the public’ doesn’t get sandwiches in the doors like they do now. I’ll leave it at this... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now