Jump to content
YRT-Guy

Modifying a page title

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, FelixINX said:

To put you in context, the AMT was abolished to make place for a new agency, exo. I don't think we should rename the old AMT page because there is already an exo page.

For example, the STM have it's page and his predecessor too (STCUM, CTCUM, ...). The fleet that has been transferred to the new agency has been renamed, eg: Société de transport de Montréal 21-202 to 21-275.

What do you think?

Understood, thanks for the additional context. I didn't know there was an exo page already, as the old AMT didn't have a link to it in the first paragraph.

I think leaving it as AMT is great.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This page (https://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php/Orange_County_Transportation_Authority_5502-5599,_5601-5674, ) either needs its comma removed at the end or it has to be renamed 'Orange County Transportation Authority 5501-5599, 5601-5674, 7501-7529' if you want to merge all of the separate pages for OCTA units 5501, 7529, and 7501-7528 into the main page itself, which is huge considering there are 200 units in OCTA's 2007 model year New Flyer C40LFRs along with the 2006 model demo unit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The three above requests by @160 Downriver, @OCTD 2039, @Stalwart23 have been completed.

19 hours ago, OCTD 2039 said:

This page (https://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php/Orange_County_Transportation_Authority_5502-5599,_5601-5674, ) either needs its comma removed at the end or it has to be renamed 'Orange County Transportation Authority 5501-5599, 5601-5674, 7501-7529' if you want to merge all of the separate pages for OCTA units 5501, 7529, and 7501-7528 into the main page itself, which is huge considering there are 200 units in OCTA's 2007 model year New Flyer C40LFRs along with the 2006 model demo unit.

I moved the main 5502-5599, 5601-5674 page to the combined title, and redirected the pages for 5501 and 7529 to the new larger page. Hopefully that works for you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm debating if this page should be split in two or not: 

https://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php/Société_de_transport_de_l'Outaouais_1801-1827

Even though they are the same models, year, engine/hybrid system, etc. They are two separate orders and they are distinguishable from their battery packs and their driver windows.

1801-1817 (1st order) was delivered in Early 2018 (This order as the old driver's window and battery pack)

1818-1827 (2nd order) was delivered in Summer 2018 (This order as the new driver's window and battery pack)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, STO_1601 said:

I'm debating if this page should be split in two or not: 

https://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php/Société_de_transport_de_l'Outaouais_1801-1827

Even though they are the same models, year, engine/hybrid system, etc. They are two separate orders and they are distinguishable from their battery packs and their driver windows.

1801-1817 (1st order) was delivered in Early 2018 (This order as the old driver's window and battery pack)

1818-1827 (2nd order) was delivered in Summer 2018 (This order as the new driver's window and battery pack)

They're only split into 2 if they were delivered in different years or are significantly different than the previous gen/design.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, OCTranspoMaster said:

They're only split into 2 if they were delivered in different years or are significantly different than the previous gen/design.

Some pages on the wiki have 2 pages for separate orders of models order the same year

STO's 2003 Nova LFSs is a primary example:

https://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php/Société_de_transport_de_l'Outaouais_0301-0313

https://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php/Société_de_transport_de_l'Outaouais_0314-0328

The first order has the smaller taillights and an Allison Transmission while the second order has the larger taillights and a ZF Transmission.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@OCTranspoMaster, I notice that the CPTDB wiki pages for OC Transpo 4440-4502 and 4503-4526 are split into two pages which doesn't make sense considering they're both exactly the same. Unless 4503-4526 were delivered with EPA 2007 USLD engines in them, there should be no reason for the separate pages.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/10/2019 at 1:46 PM, STO_1601 said:

I'm debating if this page should be split in two or not: 

https://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php/Société_de_transport_de_l'Outaouais_1801-1827

Even though they are the same models, year, engine/hybrid system, etc. They are two separate orders and they are distinguishable from their battery packs and their driver windows.

1801-1817 (1st order) was delivered in Early 2018 (This order as the old driver's window and battery pack)

1818-1827 (2nd order) was delivered in Summer 2018 (This order as the new driver's window and battery pack)

Not necessary. However someone can note those differences between orders in the notes sections.

On 4/10/2019 at 2:18 PM, STO_1601 said:

Some pages on the wiki have 2 pages for separate orders of models order the same year

STO's 2003 Nova LFSs is a primary example:

https://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php/Société_de_transport_de_l'Outaouais_0301-0313

https://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php/Société_de_transport_de_l'Outaouais_0314-0328

The first order has the smaller taillights and an Allison Transmission while the second order has the larger taillights and a ZF Transmission.

This is fine. Also their VINs are significantly different. It really depends on who created the pages sometimes.

 

On 4/10/2019 at 5:01 PM, OC Transpo/STO Fan said:

@OCTranspoMaster, I notice that the CPTDB wiki pages for OC Transpo 4440-4502 and 4503-4526 are split into two pages which doesn't make sense considering they're both exactly the same. Unless 4503-4526 were delivered with EPA 2007 USLD engines in them, there should be no reason for the separate pages.

Fixed. I added a black line to note the difference in VIN sequence. https://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php/Ottawa-Carleton_Regional_Transit_Commission_4440-4526

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Detroit Diesel 6V92TA said:

Not necessary. However someone can note those differences between orders in the notes sections.

This is fine. Also their VINs are significantly different. It really depends on who created the pages sometimes.

 

Fixed. I added a black line to note the difference in VIN sequence. https://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php/Ottawa-Carleton_Regional_Transit_Commission_4440-4526

Thank you. Come to think of it, I may add to the description that 4503-4526 were added on and were not part of the original order.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This page (https://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php/Los_Angeles_County_Metropolitan_Transportation_Authority_12501-12536) has to be renamed into three separate pages: 'Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority 12500-12527', 'Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority 12530-12534', and 'Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority 12535-12536' because the URL I have provided below for the LA Metro contractor fleet roster shows units 12530-12536 are actually cutaway buses, not ElDorado MST II diesel buses and fleet numbers 12528-12529 do not exist at all.

Units 12530-12534 are 2001 ElDorado National Aerotechs with Ford Econoline cabs, originally numbered 8064-8068; VINs for these buses are: 1HA06456-1HA06460

Units 12535-12536 are 2002 ElDorado National Aerotechs with Ford Econoline cabs, ex-Pasadena Transit 1764-1765 ; VINs for these buses are unknown.

Units 12500-12527 are 2001 ElDorado National MST II diesel buses originally numbered 11500-11527; VINs for these buses are: 1CH89443-1CH894470

LA Metro's MST II diesel buses are missing some important stuff found in a typical bus series' info page and were renumbered out of order from their original fleet numbers.

Source: http://www.rapidtransit-press.com/mta.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, OCTD 2039 said:

This page (https://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php/Los_Angeles_County_Metropolitan_Transportation_Authority_12501-12536) has to be renamed into three separate pages: 'Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority 12500-12527', 'Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority 12530-12534', and 'Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority 12535-12536' because the URL I have provided below for the LA Metro contractor fleet roster shows units 12530-12536 are actually cutaway buses, not ElDorado MST II diesel buses and fleet numbers 12528-12529 do not exist at all.

Units 12530-12534 are 2001 ElDorado National Aerotechs with Ford Econoline cabs, originally numbered 8064-8068; VINs for these buses are: 1HA06456-1HA06460

Units 12535-12536 are 2002 ElDorado National Aerotechs with Ford Econoline cabs, ex-Pasadena Transit 1764-1765 ; VINs for these buses are unknown.

Units 12500-12527 are 2001 ElDorado National MST II diesel buses originally numbered 11500-11527; VINs for these buses are: 1CH89443-1CH894470

LA Metro's MST II diesel buses are missing some important stuff found in a typical bus series' info page and were renumbered out of order from their original fleet numbers.

Source: http://www.rapidtransit-press.com/mta.html

Thanks. I've renamed that page to 12500-12527, and edited the main fleet roster page to add 12530-12534 and 12535-12536.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.flickr.com/search/?sort=date-taken-desc&safe_search=1&tags=sunbus&user_id=22421801%40N00&view_all=1

This page (https://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php/SunLine_Transit_Agency_575-615) has to be renamed 'SunLine Transit Agency 575-621' because, by clicking the URL provided above, there are some photos that clearly show units 618, 620, and 621 exist as 2008 New Flyer C40LF buses; the page is not finished yet with units 589, 596-598, and 600-601 missing VINs.  

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/10/2019 at 8:01 PM, OC Transpo/STO Fan said:

@OCTranspoMaster, I notice that the CPTDB wiki pages for OC Transpo 4440-4502 and 4503-4526 are split into two pages which doesn't make sense considering they're both exactly the same. Unless 4503-4526 were delivered with EPA 2007 USLD engines in them, there should be no reason for the separate pages.

For future reference, I have disabled be notified from being tagged. Inbox me next time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Thomasw said:

21-27 should be Maui Bus 21-27

Sorry my mistake when creating the page

No problem. I've moved the page to the correct title.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×