mtltransitguy Posted January 15, 2009 Report Share Posted January 15, 2009 Great work Steve! I'm not sure what we would do without your New Look knowledge! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Classic 9401 Posted January 15, 2009 Report Share Posted January 15, 2009 The 18-xxx roster is now online!! Later today and Tomorrow I will add somes informations to the 16-xxx, 17-xxx, 18-xxx rosters, like the seating, to complete them. Have a good day everyone!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stm_5307N Posted January 15, 2009 Report Share Posted January 15, 2009 Great work Steve!I'm not sure what we would do without your New Look knowledge! Thank you. I'll be finishing up the 25, 33 and 44 series New Looks later on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stm_5307N Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 Added 25, 33 and 44 series New Looks list in detail by division and added notes. I still have to add more notes to the 21 to 25 New Looks for the one's active in 2002. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Classic 9401 Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 I'm actually finding 16-xxx and 17-xxx that has the suburban seating, everything should be online tomorrow! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stm_5307N Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 Any chance someone wants to start filling out the STM GM Classic lists by divison with notes? Matt? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Classic 9401 Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 Before posting the bus (16-xxx and 17-xxx) that has the suburban trash seating, I want to know if you guys know any others that I don't have; if you have some others just list them here, and I'll add on the wiki because before posting them I still have to do something else. So here's the one I have: #16-134, #16-135, #16-178, #17-002, #17-013, #17-017, #17-027 Any others that you guys know? thank You! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kellergraham Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 Before posting the bus (16-xxx and 17-xxx) that has the suburban trash seating, I want to know if you guys know any others that I don't have; if you have some others just list them here, and I'll add on the wiki because before posting them I still have to do something else. So here's the one I have: #16-134, #16-135, #16-178, #17-002, #17-013, #17-017, #17-027 Any others that you guys know? thank You! 17-016 has suburban seating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stm_5307N Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 Before posting the bus (16-xxx and 17-xxx) that has the suburban trash seating, I want to know if you guys know any others that I don't have; if you have some others just list them here, and I'll add on the wiki because before posting them I still have to do something else. So here's the one I have: #16-134, #16-135, #16-178, #17-002, #17-013, #17-017, #17-027 Any others that you guys know? thank You! There tons of them that got that ugly seating.. Isn't every bus from 16-110 to 17-030 suburban seating? Or else why would the STM have put in this random seating plan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M. David Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 There tons of them that got that ugly seating.. Isn't every bus from 16-110 to 17-030 suburban seating? Or else why would the STM have put in this random seating plan? My guess is that everything from 16-130 to about 17-046 has the suburban seating. To help with the suburban seating list, I can confirm that SL 17-037 definitely has it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMS Posted January 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 Certainly from what I can personally remember: 16-137 16-177 17-001 17-007 I didn't know that it was consecutive :angry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stm_5307N Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 Added final survivors section to all 21 to 25 and 44 series new look sections. It's basically a list of all buses in each series that survived till the end in 2002. So if we had fanned in 2002 to catch the last new looks in Montreal, those would have been the ones we would have saw running. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Classic 9401 Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 Thank you guys for the answers! I think they really start at #16-130 and I just find out that #17-045 has them also, so I believe that Mark is right with #17-046. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclair14 Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 Just to know what you think of the major overhaul i've done to the RTC page, still a lot of english corrections to do but let's evaluate the frame http://www.cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php?title=R..._de_la_Capitale Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Classic 9401 Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 Just to know what you think of the major overhaul i've done to the RTC page, still a lot of english corrections to do but let's evaluate the framehttp://www.cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php?title=R..._de_la_Capitale You actually did a good work! I love this page. This Quebec wiki section is really coming good! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
general682002 Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 Just to know what you think of the major overhaul i've done to the RTC page, still a lot of english corrections to do but let's evaluate the framehttp://www.cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php?title=R..._de_la_Capitale Some corrections for RTC powertrain fleet: 9501-51 Classic have B400R 5-speed, not V731 9901-25, 0001-25 still have ZF HP500 Since when 0101-25 have B400R? Isn't still ZF as Nova standard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclair14 Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 Some corrections for RTC powertrain fleet:9501-51 Classic have B400R 5-speed, not V731 9901-25, 0001-25 still have ZF HP500 Since when 0101-25 have B400R? Isn't still ZF as Nova standard? For the 01 - They are Allison powertrain For the other 2, i will check Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
general682002 Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 For the 01 - They are Allison powertrain Thanks, I didn't see those on the road during my visit or may have missed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stm_5307N Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 Well I got into the mood for updating all the STCUM GM New Look stuff for the wiki, so I added some of my New Look pictures for the 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 44 series. I hope you guys are enjoying the work I'm doing.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMS Posted January 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 I like it! Sadly when it comes to the buses pre-STM, we will have to do rosters for: STCUM http://www.cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php?title=S...e_Montr%C3%A9al CTCUM http://www.cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php?title=C...e_Montr%C3%A9al and possibly even CTM http://www.cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php?title=C...e_Montr%C3%A9al We might as well duplicate applicable photos from STM to STCUM for starters. But if others want to have a go at thumbnails, that could be cool too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stm_5307N Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 I like it! Sadly when it comes to the buses pre-STM, we will have to do rosters for: STCUM http://www.cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php?title=S...e_Montr%C3%A9al CTCUM http://www.cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php?title=C...e_Montr%C3%A9al and possibly even CTM http://www.cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php?title=C...e_Montr%C3%A9al We might as well duplicate applicable photos from STM to STCUM for starters. But if others want to have a go at thumbnails, that could be cool too. You can duplicate what i did for the 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 33 and 44 series new looks for the STCUM and CTCUM pages. As for all the other series of new looks, I don't have info, but I know MTL Bus Pat has an older roster that has garage allocation for them. If he wants, he can scan me the pages and I"ll do the lists or he can do it himself, but I don't think he's a wiki editor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMS Posted January 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 Detailed information is likely not necessary as garage allocations have changed many times in the past. VINs don't change but sometimes license plates do. This is going to be a very complicated process unfortunately. I can be very happy with just thumbnails of pictures. I think most people here would agree, and want to concentrate on the present and not the past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stm_5307N Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 Detailed information is likely not necessary as garage allocations have changed many times in the past. VINs don't change but sometimes license plates do. This is going to be a very complicated process unfortunately. I can be very happy with just thumbnails of pictures. I think most people here would agree, and want to concentrate on the present and not the past. The only people I know that took old Montreal New Look pictures are not ont his board and don't even have the internet for that matter... You have to get copyright permission first from the author before you put up the picture on the wiki. I know that Bob and Claude who supplied me with tons of Montreal New Look pictures do not want their photos on the net. So I'm limited to just my personal photos I took to post up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMS Posted January 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 I think that's good enough anyway. I think everyone here is doing a really kickass job. For once we're leaving other people in the dust! The most important thing though as I wrote is to keep up with stuff in the present. Doing past stuff is a luxury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orion VIII Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 Damn, you guys are giving me and my beloved Mississauga Transit pages a run for my money! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now