Jump to content

Transit Tracker - Greater Montréal, Greater Toronto, Sherbrooke and Lévis


FelixINX
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Gerbil said:

The sorting by vehicle number doesn't seem to work (although it does with the other columns):

Fixed

8 hours ago, Gerbil said:

The filter turns up unexpected results (seems to be any route with '5' and '1' in this case)

Will be fixed tomorrow.

8 hours ago, Gerbil said:

And the table doesn't display properly on mobile:

It's not a bug, it's actually a feature! Some people like the new layout and some don't, so I added a option to go back to the old layout in the settings menu.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FelixINX said:

Fixed

Will be fixed tomorrow.

It's not a bug, it's actually a feature! Some people like the new layout and some don't, so I added a option to go back to the old layout in the settings menu.

I tried the sorting vehicle number after the fixes and it still doesn't seem to work for me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, jge0364 said:

I tried the sorting vehicle number after the fixes and it still doesn't seem to work for me. 

Both are now fixed as of this morning (version 2.4.2)!

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there's a bug for the homepage of each region. I can only see one transit agency at a time, not being able to select others. I'm using Firefox, so I don't know if it's caused by a browser or not.

bug.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, anyfong said:

I think there's a bug for the homepage of each region. I can only see one transit agency at a time, not being able to select others. I'm using Firefox, so I don't know if it's caused by a browser or not.

bug.png

Have you selected the agencies in the settings? The settings may not have been migrated to the new version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/3/2021 at 8:19 PM, FelixINX said:

Fixed

Will be fixed tomorrow.

It's not a bug, it's actually a feature! Some people like the new layout and some don't, so I added a option to go back to the old layout in the settings menu.

As usual, your hard work into the app is much appreciated. However I must say I agree with the opinion that the new layout isn't optimal. On mobile, the priority is to display the information in a clear and  concise manner, the now default table layout results in an endless stream of text that makes it hard to have a quick glance of active units. I think you wanted to avoid the table to scroll left and right, but I'm fine with it.

Otherwise, it's nice to display the route names, however I noticed there is no longer a way to filter out the school and industrial extras (by typing E or I into the filter field). I'm not sure if there's a simple way to go around this, plus it's only at the STM...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/4/2021 at 8:02 AM, FelixINX said:

Both are now fixed as of this morning (version 2.4.2)!

Thank you!

There still seems to be an issue with the filter for route number, where it doesn't show added trips, school or industrial extras (without corresponding trip ID in the static data). I think that should be a priority, as seeing those extras is one of the major advantages of transit tracker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding the route column on the table page - Everything is now fixed as of 2.4.3!

  • You can search the route ID, route short name and route long name OR only the route ID (if you tick the box)
  • Sorting will sort the route ID

Sorry for this bug !

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Data to be corrected for exo

Listed as 4-191, should be 4-195 1BAKGCSH3KFE345493

Listed as 3-649, should be 4-1912 1FDFE4FSXKDC59968, Correct VIN for 3-649 is 1FDFE4FS8KDC00109

Listed as 5095225, should be 5059225 1GD675BL8F1187626

 

 
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, MTL66 said:

Data to be corrected for exo

Listed as 4-191, should be 4-195 1BAKGCSH3KFE345493

Listed as 3-649, should be 4-1912 1FDFE4FSXKDC59968, Correct VIN for 3-649 is 1FDFE4FS8KDC00109

Listed as 5095225, should be 5059225 1GD675BL8F1187626

 

Thanks for your contribution!

Are you sure about the first VIN? I can't find it in the database.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like the new exo VIN submission for the tracker. I just have to sort through the rest of the transdev fleet database I was sent by my new Transdev contact and compare it to the data from my contact at exo and the database on the tracker and we should have all the remaining vins that are outstanding or at least close to it.

My data is accurate up to October 16th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure if the voting system is working, but currently parked at Terminus Repentigny trying to jot down VINs as they come through.

This VIN has multiple submissions, but the real bus # is 212-912, confirmed it twice.

Screenshot_20211022-171107_Firefox.thumb.jpg.38d77aed667d382eff23cbaa4238f23f.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, MTL66 said:

I am not sure if the voting system is working, but currently parked at Terminus Repentigny trying to jot down VINs as they come through.

This VIN has multiple submissions, but the real bus # is 212-912, confirmed it twice.

Screenshot_20211022-171107_Firefox.thumb.jpg.38d77aed667d382eff23cbaa4238f23f.jpg

It does work as intended. User might have entered the wrong label when making a submission. Maybe the fleet label has changed, maybe exo use the same VIN for multiple buses? There is multiple reason why this would be the case. I'll still approve your submission for now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, FelixINX said:

It does work as intended. User might have entered the wrong label when making a submission. Maybe the fleet label has changed, maybe exo use the same VIN for multiple buses? There is multiple reason why this would be the case. I'll still approve your submission for now!

From what I could see on the buses, it looks like Keolis changed the numbers of certain buses. The last 2 digits of almost every LFS and a couple of Vicinity buses were in a different font and not alligned with the oriignial fleet number

Example:

image.thumb.png.17bfb7655725285629fb7fe4c7102b45.png

When I try to vote for a submission, on mobile or on my computer, I get this error.

image.thumb.png.808a16e2890bfadac553046fd7e6e4b2.png

Also a suggestion to have a button to return to the main API page after we submit a VIN or consult a VIN number. Once we search for the VIN and go onto it's page, there is no option to go back to the main page of the API. When we click on the Transit Tracker logo, it brings us to the main Transit Tracker Website.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/24/2021 at 1:43 AM, MTL66 said:

From what I could see on the buses, it looks like Keolis changed the numbers of certain buses. The last 2 digits of almost every LFS and a couple of Vicinity buses were in a different font and not alligned with the oriignial fleet number

Example:

image.thumb.png.17bfb7655725285629fb7fe4c7102b45.png

When I try to vote for a submission, on mobile or on my computer, I get this error.

image.thumb.png.808a16e2890bfadac553046fd7e6e4b2.png

Also a suggestion to have a button to return to the main API page after we submit a VIN or consult a VIN number. Once we search for the VIN and go onto it's page, there is no option to go back to the main page of the API. When we click on the Transit Tracker logo, it brings us to the main Transit Tracker Website.

Some improvements are planned, I just have to find the time to build them!

Regarding the reCaptcha error, I don't see the icon which may indicate that there was a network problem on Google end (if this was a one time issue).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 11/1/2021 at 11:25 AM, sdgta2008 said:

Any indication if STO will be re-sharing tracking info once they've finished dealing with their cybersecurity breach?

STO bus tracking (transit app) has been restored for well over a month now; however the bus positions are still frozen at "3 months ago" on Transit Tracker.  Any word if their data will be refreshed....?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...