FelixINX Posted December 6, 2021 Author Report Share Posted December 6, 2021 42 minutes ago, Technet9090 said: I don't know what's going on but I cannot use the tracker on my phone for the past few days! Phone is Google Pixel 6 Pro But for some reason it works just fine on my PC I have also noticed this issue yesterday. I also have a Pixel 6, and the issue seems only present in Chrome. Try Firefox, it should work just fine. I have no clue what's happening but I'll keep looking! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Technet9090 Posted December 6, 2021 Report Share Posted December 6, 2021 1 hour ago, FelixINX said: I have also noticed this issue yesterday. I also have a Pixel 6, and the issue seems only present in Chrome. Try Firefox, it should work just fine. I have no clue what's happening but I'll keep looking! Thanks for the reply, I tried it with Opera GX and it works now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FelixINX Posted December 10, 2021 Author Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 On 12/6/2021 at 2:31 PM, Technet9090 said: Thanks for the reply, I tried it with Opera GX and it works now! Seems like the issue has fixed itself on my side. Here is a workaround : you can try to force Chrome to recheck the SSL/HTTPS security certificate. Open Transit Tracker then type this in the address bar: javascript:(window.location='https://api.transittracker.ca/v2/landing') Go back and it should work. If it still doesn't after selecting a region, type this: javascript:(window.location='https://api.transittracker.ca/v2/regions') Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTL66 Posted December 26, 2021 Report Share Posted December 26, 2021 @FelixINX Some changes for the VINs of exo Presqu'ile. Got a confirmation email from a contact for the Street Side Guide 343 1GD675BL7F1186466 347 1GD675BL3F1186660 357 1GD67UBL5G1178037 358 1GD67UBL3G1175573 364 1FDFE4FS1KDC00095 367 1FDFE4FS9KDC00099 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
citfan2020 Posted December 29, 2021 Report Share Posted December 29, 2021 Exo vin TM 2MG3JMEA1AW065635 2010 J4500 2PCH33492EC712501 2014 H3-45 2PCH33490EC712559 2014 H3-45 RTCR 7GZ67UBG0HN003747 217-40 7GZ67UBG3HN003502 217-40 7GZ67UBG3HN003600 2017-40 2FYD9VR03EB044997 29703 2G9B30AA2MA098231 221-906 2NVYL82J1M3753132 221-20 2NVYL82J2M3753124 221-20 2NVYL82J4M3753125 221-20 CITVR 2PCH334938C711183 8034 2PCH334938C711152 2007 H3-45 2PCH3349161010408 604 2G9B27AAXGA098039 6029216 SURF 2MGTRMEA18W065007 2008 MCI E4500 1FDFE4FS3KDC59973 2019 Ford 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FelixINX Posted December 31, 2021 Author Report Share Posted December 31, 2021 Transit Tracker v2.6 With version 2.6, you can now subscribe to push notifications! These notifications are available for most browsers, except for iOS devices which do not yet have this feature. There are three types of notifications: New vehicles: receive a notification when there is a new vehicle, for the selected agencies; STM New Flyer: Receive a notification when one of the STM's new electric buses starts a service for the day. With GTFS Tools by @Gerbil, quickly follow the next bus departures; General alerts: be the first to know about new features or other news from Transit Tracker. (Coming soon, in Q1 2022) Favourite buses: select your favourite buses and receive notifications when they enter service for the day. Similar to STM New Flyer notification, but it will be available to all buses. The notification centre is accessible from the settings menu, or by using the bell icon on the home page. This feature is in beta. This is the most complex feature I've ever launched for Transit Tracker. If you encounter any bugs, please let me know! Along push notifications, the exo VIN database has been updated and should allow me to accept suggestions faster than before. Some previous bugs were also corrected. Happy holidays everyone and happy new year 2022! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTL66 Posted January 1, 2022 Report Share Posted January 1, 2022 2M93JMFA18W064968 INCORRECTLY LISTED AS 809338, SHOULD BE 808338 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
citfan2020 Posted January 4, 2022 Report Share Posted January 4, 2022 Last exo vins TM 2MG3JMEA1AW065635 2010 MCI 2PCH33492EC712501 2014 H3 VR 2PCH334938C711152 2007 H3 RTCR 2NVYL82J1M3753132 221-203-221-206-221-208 2NVYL82J2M3753124 221-203-221-206-221-208 2NVYL82J4M3753125 221-203-221-206-221-208 Not sure what this is about 11111111111111111 for exo Roussillon it’s either 80701 or 80801 because 81201 does not have a tracker and I saw it on the 130 and it was not tracking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
citfan2020 Posted January 10, 2022 Report Share Posted January 10, 2022 Found the bus 805225 is actually 805316 they probably took the tracker from that bud and put it in 805316 and the info has never been changed Never mind I saw it from the highway I know it was a X3-45 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
citfan2020 Posted February 4, 2022 Report Share Posted February 4, 2022 Just note vehicle 2PCG33491BC735002 that’s is supposed to be 6101 is actually 6357 100% confirmed after observing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FelixINX Posted February 5, 2022 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2022 23 hours ago, citfan2020 said: Just note vehicle 2PCG33491BC735002 that’s is supposed to be 6101 is actually 6357 100% confirmed after observing Please send your suggestions through https://api.transittracker.ca/vin , it's easier that way. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTL66 Posted February 7, 2022 Report Share Posted February 7, 2022 On 2/5/2022 at 5:42 PM, FelixINX said: Please send your suggestions through https://api.transittracker.ca/vin , it's easier that way. Thanks! The tracker is from 6101, but the VIN showing on the tracker is that of 6101. They have not renamed the tracker with the correct VIN yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
citfan2020 Posted February 7, 2022 Report Share Posted February 7, 2022 9 hours ago, MTL66 said: The tracker is from 6101, but the VIN showing on the tracker is that of 6101. They have not renamed the tracker with the correct VIN yet. So 6101 is no longer in service Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rgilmtl Posted February 7, 2022 Report Share Posted February 7, 2022 Is there a naming convention for sectors with multiple operators? I've seen one of the REM shuttles marked as FDL ####. Will that be an expectation from now on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FelixINX Posted February 8, 2022 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 7 hours ago, rgilmtl said: Is there a naming convention for sectors with multiple operators? I've seen one of the REM shuttles marked as FDL ####. Will that be an expectation from now on? The naming convention is use the fleet label that is displayed outside the vehicle. FDL is the only exception (it's a temporary contract). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTL66 Posted February 12, 2022 Report Share Posted February 12, 2022 I put the REM Shuttles for FDL like that because of the way they assign their fleet numbers using the last 4 digits of the VIN. Transdev also has buses with the same 4 last digits, it is to avoid confusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
citfan2020 Posted February 15, 2022 Report Share Posted February 15, 2022 Is there anyway for the tracker to have the schedule of the busses like the STM ones on gerbils? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FelixINX Posted February 16, 2022 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2022 On 2/14/2022 at 8:31 PM, citfan2020 said: Is there anyway for the tracker to have the schedule of the busses like the STM ones on gerbils? It's something I've already thought about, but for now I don't intend to integrate the schedule. If I ever would, there would also be the real-time schedule which is more complex and requires more resources (on the server side), especially given the scope of Transit Tracker. I'm not saying no, just not now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
citfan2020 Posted March 28, 2022 Report Share Posted March 28, 2022 Vins SURF 2MG3JMBA4CW066026 1T88SAE1XE1271913 =602 TM 2PCH33492EC712501 ? 2NVYL82J5G3750335=29276 2PCG33491BC735002? 2FYD9VR06GB049212=29713 2FYD9VR04GB049225 2FYD9VR09GB049222 =29723 2NVYL82J1G3750333=29274 2FYD9VR09GB049219? 2FYD9VR05GB049220 =29719 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTL66 Posted March 30, 2022 Report Share Posted March 30, 2022 On 3/28/2022 at 6:41 AM, citfan2020 said: Vins SURF 2MG3JMBA4CW066026 1T88SAE1XE1271913 =602 TM 2PCH33492EC712501 ? 2NVYL82J5G3750335=29276 2PCG33491BC735002? 2FYD9VR06GB049212=29713 2FYD9VR04GB049225 2FYD9VR09GB049222 =29723 2NVYL82J1G3750333=29274 2FYD9VR09GB049219? 2FYD9VR05GB049220 =29719 Are these confirmed sightings? If so I will add them on the tracker. When I mean confirmed, I mean seen with and compared with the map. There were a lot of errors on the TM Vins, just trying to get them as accurate as possible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTL66 Posted May 1, 2022 Report Share Posted May 1, 2022 Haven't been posting much in the last couple of months, but working behind the scenes trying to get the tracker up to date the exo side on the Montreal area. As of right now, we only need to confirm 10 more units, to make it even easier, they are all units from exo Terrebonne-Mascouche. My goal in the next couple of weeks is to spend some more time in areas served by exo TM. exo TM was rifled with errors from erroneous VINs associated to the wrong bus. At 1 point there were 4 buses tracking as 29278... Those erros have been fixed over the last couple of months, most of the VINs left to confirm are local buses (297xx series), as the VINs posted on the wiki pages were wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTL66 Posted May 2, 2022 Report Share Posted May 2, 2022 13 hours ago, yikeslol said: From what I've seen irl and from what i know 2FYD9VR09GB049219 is 29718 which has the green livery 2PCG33491BC735002 is 6101, a Prevost X3-45 with a blue exo livery which has only be sent in service the summer of last year, it's also ex-Orléans Express 6101 The tracker from 6101 is now on different unit. They have not updated the ID of the unit. 6101 was retired in September. The unit is 63XX, I for get off the top of my head which unit, but until they change the VIN we can't put it up. I will update 29718 accordingly. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frozen Yogurt Posted May 7, 2022 Report Share Posted May 7, 2022 On 5/1/2022 at 1:18 AM, MTL66 said: As of right now, we only need to confirm 10 more units, to make it even easier, they are all units from exo Terrebonne-Mascouche. Seems like some new VIN recently popped up at Dufresne, ruining this statement temporarily. It's 82107M (1HA6GVB72MN006870), some Chevrolet + Aerotech (reading off what it says on the body) thing in a watermelon pink exo livery. I can't input "82107M" into the VIN suggestion form, it tells me it can't end with a letter, so kindly take this one. Another thing I've noticed: on the wiki, 81607 is indicated to have the VIN 4RKG33498G9737302 (some X3-45), however on Transit Tracker VIN project page, this fleet number is assigned to 2MG3JM8A7GW067653, which is that of a 2016 MCI J4500. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTL66 Posted May 7, 2022 Report Share Posted May 7, 2022 3 hours ago, Frozen Yogurt said: Seems like some new VIN recently popped up at Dufresne, ruining this statement temporarily. It's 82107M (1HA6GVB72MN006870), some Chevrolet + Aerotech (reading off what it says on the body) thing in a watermelon pink exo livery. I can't input "82107M" into the VIN suggestion form, it tells me it can't end with a letter, so kindly take this one. Another thing I've noticed: on the wiki, 81607 is indicated to have the VIN 4RKG33498G9737302 (some X3-45), however on Transit Tracker VIN project page, this fleet number is assigned to 2MG3JM8A7GW067653, which is that of a 2016 MCI J4500. So 82107 finally made it into service. That bus has a long and complicated history. Last I heard it was still in court. The dealership said the bus was delivered and signed for, but no one at either Dufresne garage had ever seen the bus. It was a fight back and forth, Dufresne saying they never signed for that bus, and the dealership saying they have a signature. I can confirm 81607 is indeed an X3-45 (Ex-Indian Trails), I had a friend working there last year and spent almost every weekend riding his bus and was at the garage very often. I can tell you for sure, neither Dufresne contract for exo has a 2016 MCI on their roster. The only 2016 MCI that Dufresne owns is a charter bus in Gold livery numbered 3161 if memory serves. If a bus is tracking with that VIN, then the wrong VIN was entered into the chrono system. 81607 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frozen Yogurt Posted May 8, 2022 Report Share Posted May 8, 2022 13 hours ago, MTL66 said: So 82107 finally made it into service. That bus has a long and complicated history. Last I heard it was still in court. The dealership said the bus was delivered and signed for, but no one at either Dufresne garage had ever seen the bus. It was a fight back and forth, Dufresne saying they never signed for that bus, and the dealership saying they have a signature. 82107 is definitely last-minute delivered and rushed into service, the new Opus reader was only half assembled and the wiring near the destination signs looks like bird's nest. Thanks for the additional information about 81607. 3161 is indeed on the wiki, and shown as a 2016 J4500, so hopefully we got its VIN for free. === Now moving on to Laurentides: 1) I'm not sure what is with this VIN 2NVYL82jXG3750184 saying 3-629: on the wiki, this same VIN is attributed to Keolis 29271. When one looks up the VIN of 3-629 also on the wiki, it says it's an MTA reject with some Plattsburgh VIN instead. I wonder if someone has some clarifications on this. 2) https://plc.ua/en/auctions/lot/newflyer-transit-bus-2014-vin-2fyd9vr0xeb044611-ia-11345558/ This may have been Transcobec 630, which does have the same color. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now