Jump to content

TTC CLRV/ALRV updates and discussion


Recommended Posts

Interesting that in that photo of 4210 at that link from November 2018, the car had its lights on despite being parked in that spot for months on end. Is that not a waste, to keep a dead streetcar lit up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The post just says “... sleep well 4242. Thank you for your service.” There no indication of it scrapped as of yet. 

On that note, 4215 sits in the spot where 4242 once was. 4029 looks to be on the chopping block as well. Relic preservers will have to act quickly on this one

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TTC 9701 said:

Are they? Don't call out places as that could and will ruin the chances for any to be preserved.

It's been previously confirmed in this thread that Seashore are interesting in acquiring a CLRV. There was a longstanding rumour that they wanted one of the three that went to Boston, but with 4029 being as shabby as it is and the other two long gone I'd be surprised if that was the one they ended up going for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PCC Guy said:

It's been previously confirmed in this thread that Seashore are interesting in acquiring a CLRV. There was a longstanding rumour that they wanted one of the three that went to Boston, but with 4029 being as shabby as it is and the other two long gone I'd be surprised if that was the one they ended up going for.

It's been talked and bandied about for years, probably since the three cars ran in Boston, so it's far from being top secret, eyes only stuff.

Anyways, on the subject of off-TTC operations, I was talking with some friends a while ago and one of them's convinced that a CLRV was demonstrated on the Shaker Heights line in Cleveland back in the day.  Something about that sounds vaguely familiar like maybe the idea was contemplated at one point but I couldn't turn up anything online to conclusively prove or disprove it unlike the Boston and Swiss trials.  Does anybody know one way or the other for sure? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The post of 4242 is outdated. There's no evidence of it being scrapped. 4210 was on the last track (west) when I was at Russell.

Trolley pole on 4210 was tied down.

Catcher/receiver on 4210 has been harvested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I marked 4242 as being retired at the start of the month. I felt it was reasonable to conclude that it had been, based on its prolonged absence from service, as well as the number of ALRVs that were reported as being active in the service summary compared to what was still tracking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jor said:

How did 4229 go from retired to active again?

I realized it was never indicated as being stripped, plus the plans to put the ALRVs back in service mean that we don't actually know if that one will run again or not.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Wayside Observer said:

Anyways, on the subject of off-TTC operations, I was talking with some friends a while ago and one of them's convinced that a CLRV was demonstrated on the Shaker Heights line in Cleveland back in the day.  Something about that sounds vaguely familiar like maybe the idea was contemplated at one point but I couldn't turn up anything online to conclusively prove or disprove it unlike the Boston and Swiss trials.  Does anybody know one way or the other for sure? 

Back when Toronto was first receiving the CLRVs in 1978, they sold 9 PCCs to Cleveland for the Shaker Heights line. Perhaps this is misremembered, or there was some talk back then of testing one of the CLRVs there. Should be some evidence if true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_Standard_Light_Rail_Vehicle

Quote

The Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority tested MBTA car #3401 on former interurban lines in mid-1976, but ultimately declined to purchase the US SLRV, instead buying custom LRVs of a different design from Breda.[21] When Cleveland released a request for quote in September 1977, Boeing Vertol bid US$869,492 (equivalent to $3,600,000 in 2018) per SLRV, exceeding Breda's winning bid of US$645,833 (equivalent to $2,700,000 in 2018) per car.[6]:221 [11][22] SEPTA of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania was initially interested (especially because the SLRV would be locally produced), but purchased custom LRVs from Kawasaki because the US SLRV would not clear the City Hall loop.[21] SEPTA tailored the bid by specifying the vehicle width to be 4 in (100 mm) narrower than the SLRV specification to exclude it from consideration.[6]:95 The Kawasaki cars for SEPTA were assembled at the Boeing Vertol plant to meet "Buy America" requirements.[23]

The US SLRV design also influenced the early design of the Canadian Light Rail Vehicle.[21]

I did a bunch of sleuthing around the internet and found this mention of an MBTA car test in Cleveland on Wikipedia. The US SLRV is visually quite similar to the CLRV (as the article mentions) so perhaps it's a case of mistaken identity. I haven't found any references to CLRV's being tested in Clevelnad, but the timelines do match up with Cleveland's purchase timelines so maybe it happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...