Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'naming conventions'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • CPTDB | Transit Discussion
    • Western Canada Transit Discussion
    • Ontario Transit Discussion
    • Qu├ębec Transit Discussion
    • Atlantic Canada Transit Discussion
    • General Aviation Discussion
    • General Railway Discussion
    • Marine Transportation Discussion
    • American Transit Discussion
    • Global Transit Discussion
    • General Motorcoach Discussion
    • General Vehicle Discussion
  • CPTDB | General Discussion
    • Transit Lounge
    • General Lounge
    • Photography Discussion
    • Transit Websites & Fan Page Updates
    • Upcoming Transit Events
    • Transit Employment Discussion
  • CPTDB | Wiki Discussion
    • General Info
    • Content Changes and Additions
  • CPTDB | Announcements & Updates
    • Site Discussion

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 8 results

  1. The part in bold seems to be a problem right now and is really bothering me.
  2. Rules regarding uploading multiple photos at a time and thumbnail replacing have been added to the CPTDB_Wiki:Photographs section of the naming conventions. These appear to have not been officially in the naming conventions but were treated as such.
  3. To alleviate problems/issues with replacing thumbnail pictures on the individual fleet range pages, I'm proposing getting rid of the thumbnail column and placing a gallery of the relevant buses at the bottom of the page. Debate and discuss please.
  4. To try to bring some standardization or at least a basic format to individual fleet series pages, I have created a poll to get some feedback. Vote on the format as seen in this sample page
  5. Vehicle should occupy the majority of the frame, be centered in the photo, and be the main focus The photo should preferably show the entire front and one side of the vehicle or the entire rear and one side of the vehicle if a photo that shows the front is already available. Photos showing side detail are also permitted as long as the vehicle is centered in the shot Photos taken in sunlight should have both viewed sides of the vehicle in direct sunlight when possible, or minimal shadows that do not interfere with the viewing of the vehicle details. The entire vehicle should be visible, i.e. not cut off by the edge of the photograph, or be partially obstructed by objects Watermarks are permitted, but should be minimal and not detract from the photo. Pictures should be of good quality, i.e. no blurring or low pixelation
  6. The issue has been brought up recently about better standardization for the Wiki. These are some items that are being discussed: Details chart - What columns should be included on all pages, Should there be a status column or not? Should bullets only belong in the notes column when there's two or more points? Infoboxes and navigation templates, etc. should have rounded corners and be in the agency's colours? Any other things that should be standardized? I decided to make a post to get some consensus and replies from the others on the board.
×
×
  • Create New...