TTC103

3550 on 320 (95 46 run)

8637 on 124

So are 1012, 1397 and 1502

3489 was on 52 earlier 3445 on 97

1114 on 54 3419 on 32 3453 on 61

1225 on 11 1397, 3508 on 34.

The article is not accurate. This is just a series of maps produced by TTCriders showing what would happen if all routes with less than 4,000 daily riders were cut. This is not official. It’s worth noting that three of the routes shown (49, 50 and 105) are duplicated by routes from other agencies. Given that one of the conditions of the additional funds is to work with Metrolinx on fare and service integration, I would expect to see service on those three corridors restructured (with TTC coordinating operations with MiWay and YRT) to eliminate the duplication of service.

9234 on 124.

1140 on 74

I wouldn’t put two much faith in what BlogTO says. It is all speculation at this point. On the topic of microtransit, I question if any of the TTC’s conventional routes meet the conditions for microtransit to be more efficient that conventional fixed-route services. According to Jarrett Walker, a transportation consultant, demand-responsive transportation systems rarely carry more than 5 passengers per vehicle hour (see link), which I can’t imagine too many routes meet. The most plausible locations for demand-responsive transit (depending on ridership) would probably be for ro

3412, 3439 on 115 3555 on 169

I believe it’s common for them to show up on 5. Believe Mt Dennis has two morning trippers there.

TTC 1130 on 124.

TTC 8710 was on 124

TTC 3550 on 124