Jump to content

MCW Metrobus

CPTDB Administrator
  • Content count

    3,857
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

About MCW Metrobus

  • Rank
    Asian Fan Boy Wannabe

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.trans-continental.ca
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
  • Interests
    Transit, buses, light rail, music, guitars, Canadian politics, food and sleeping

Recent Profile Visitors

14,638 profile views
  1. MCW Metrobus

    Vancouver general sightings and notes

    Did you happen to notice the block number?
  2. MCW Metrobus

    West Vancouver Blue Bus

    No. They will be renumbered into the new five-digit scheme, so they will become 07001, 07002 and 07003. (B07001, B07002 and B07003 that is.)
  3. MCW Metrobus

    2018 Garage Transfers and Storage Reactivations

    Technically no. However, before it went down, you and I know who was the last person to drive it... (It wasn't me.)
  4. MCW Metrobus

    New Flyer D40LF Retirement / Storage watch

    Yeah, no... I drove that one on my birthday two years ago, good memories.
  5. MCW Metrobus

    Vancouver general sightings and notes

    The most likely reason that VTC buses might be spotted in that area is for new operators in training taking their Class 2 road test. If it looked like there was nobody else on board, it's entirely possible that the instructor was sitting down, out of view, rather than standing directly behind the operator. The road test is about the only time during CMBC training where only one student will be on a bus with the instructor; at just about all other times the students are paired up, and the instructor will be standing directly behind the student driving, while the other student will be standing directly behind the instructor. Oh, and they're all usually wearing vests... On my road test, I did the hill park exam at the bus stop EB Steveston Hwy NS Nwy 99. 😂
  6. MCW Metrobus

    Vancouver Special Sightings

    That would be 9281. Before last October, it had mismatched doors as well, one original flap and one from an '01. Then, the guy who relieved me on my 351 said he had a problem with the doors not closing properly. A day or two later, it returned with the remaining original flap replaced with one from an '01, so they matched again anyway. 😂 Technically it wasn't me - it was the morning guy. All I did was take over at Steveston Highway, drive it to Bridgeport and give it to the mechanic in exchange for 9247.
  7. MCW Metrobus

    2018 Garage Transfers and Storage Reactivations

    N7180 spotted this morning just after 10 am, signed up as "Training Vehicle", turning left from SB No. 3 Road onto EB Cook. It looked like there was an instructor on board, but I don't know what kind of training assignment would take a student into Richmond.
  8. MCW Metrobus

    New Flyer D40LF Retirement / Storage watch

    I saw what I thought was N7254 heading north on Highway 99 near Steveston Highway at about 12:30 this afternoon. Given what we've seen over the past couple of days, I think there's a real possibility that this bus was heading for VTC to be placed into service.
  9. MCW Metrobus

    Vancouver general sightings and notes

    P8083 is sitting outside the shops at RTC. Last seen May 10th according to T-Comm.
  10. MCW Metrobus

    Mauricie Transit Discussion

    I was in Shawinigan last week and got pictures of two of the Eldorados in service. I posted them here.
  11. MCW Metrobus

    Vancouver: T-Comm "E-Sightings"

    It was originally at 49th and Victoria eastbound... Must have gotten too hot again!
  12. MCW Metrobus

    Vancouver: T-Comm "E-Sightings"

    Alright people. For the greater good of the general population, by decree of Me, from this day forward, a new rule is in force. Please post all "T-Comm sightings" in this thread. This isn't an outright ban on any discussion of T-Comm anywhere else in the forum. A lot of you conspiracy theorists may be thinking that I'm trying to mastermind some draconian return to the long-lost era of waiting on street corners in the dead of winter, freezing our @$$es off, hoping against hope that some rare bus might show up and make our trip worth it. No, that's not the point of this rule. Making reports based on what you read on the Internet is not being outright prohibited. Really what's at issue here is what constitutes a "sighting". I would prefer that the definition of a "sighting" be restricted to something you see with your own two eyes, likely during a trip you're making with your own two feet, or your own four wheels, or transit's six wheels, or however many wheels happen to be on the vehicle you're driving or riding. In other words, to make a "sighting" involves you getting up out of your swivel chair, putting down your smartphone, going outside, and using your eyes to look at something other than a glowing screen. If you make a sighting that fits the above criteria, as in, you saw a bus (or train) with your own two eyes and feel that the general board population needs to know, or might want to know about it, post it in one of the sightings threads. As has always been the case, you are to use your discretion when deciding what to post, and which thread to post it in. If the bus you saw was in pieces, or it was missing a few wheels or a headlight, or maybe it was only half-painted, then chances are the bus you spotted was at BTC Fleet Overhaul, and it might make sense for you to post it in the Fleet Overhaul thread. If you spotted R3140 on the 491, then you spotted a Ghost Bus on a Ghost Route, meaning you should definitely post it in the special sightings thread, because there is no Ghost Bus Sightings thread yet. (Or maybe you should get some sleep, because you're clearly hallucinating.) The same applies to sightings made by other people and then passed on to you second-hand. Again, use your discretion, because second-hand information is not always reliable, and you always need to consider the source. If your high school classmate usually rides a Nova to school on the 41, but yesterday his run had a D40LF, think about it before you decide whether the entire board needs to know, because the information you got might well be accurate, but is it really significant? If your cousin's college roommate said he saw a double decker bus numbered R4408 at UBC the other day, allow yourself to consider just how high he was when he went wandering off to the bus loop. If your grandma says she rode an old "BC Hydro bus" on Renfrew (no really! It was one of the old trolley buses from the 60s and it stopped and picked me up, and I rang the bell and got off!).... well, actually that did happen once, on a TRAMS tour, so scrap that example. But you get the picture. These examples all have one thing in common. Someone used their eyes to obtain information from a source that did not require a glowing screen. So here's the deal. If your "sighting" does not fit that criterium (in other words, if you want to report something that you read on the internet), your sighting therefore does not constitute a sighting. From here on in, all such sightings will be referred to as "e-sightings" and shall be posted in this thread, and this thread only. As with all rules like this, of course, there will be caveats. The most important one is this: discussion of T-Comm e-sightings outside of this thread is permitted only in the event that someone has already confirmed and verified the sighting with their own two eyes, and that does not include second-hand reports. Example: Member A posts in a sightings thread that he saw Bus X on Route Y, and Member B confirms its position via a T-Comm e-sighting. This practice allows real sightings to be verified by e-sightings, and vice-versa in this thread - if Member B posts an e-sighting in this thread, and Member A can verify it with his eyes, discussion may continue in either thread. In other words, cross-referencing is allowed. What I would like to do is shift any and all discussion that originates solely from a number someone reads on a screen, into this thread. We all saw what happened on April 1st, and in future I'd like storms of excitement like that one (i.e. all over nothing) to be contained in this teacup. (For the metaphorically challenged, the teacup is this thread.) Any questions, please feel free to ask. Just post them here, my PM box is full from all the report-a-posts.
  13. I just returned from a short trip to Victoria, and have a few updates from that city's transit. While I didn't actually do any bus riding, I did drop by both garages to check out the scene there. This was my first time in the city since June, before the LFSs arrived. Thanks to a driver I know there who is a good friend of mine, I was given a full inside-out tour of 9212 in the Garbally yard. No photos unfortunately as I didn't have my camera with me that evening. 9816 is sitting at the back of Garbally with a badly crunched front end. I was told this bus rear ended a five-tonne truck. The bike rack bore the brunt of the impact, and the driver was lucky to escape with just a few scrapes. At Langford, I observed the following buses sitting stored: Orion Is - 6701, 6705, 6763 and 6772 Fishbowls - 762, 848, 5884, 5904, 5914, 5915 (edited - typo fixed) Of these, 5884 is the only one that has not seen service in Victoria recently. I think it came from Kelowna, a few months ago. All the same I assume it's in the same intact condition as the others. All the parted-out fishbowls have been sent for scrap. 5902 and 5910 were taken out several months ago, 839 and 970 were removed more recently. Given that the retired buses are now off property, the "graveyard area" on the grass against the north wall of Langford yard (which is the bit directly overlooked by a row of houses on Dunford Rd.) is now empty - except for one bus. 9925, a 1999 Dennis Dart, is parked there, and appears to be missing its back bumper. Checking allocations, it says that the bus is assigned to Victoria... but that makes no sense. Victoria doesn't have any 99s. Also, I can make out (from a photo) the residue of some lettering next to the BC Transit decal, which has been removed. I am fairly certain it reads "City of Cranbrook". I think that's about it. I did get some photos of the LFSs, they'll be posted when I get my act together. Having just got home I'm dealing with a bit of a backlog right now, also I'm going to Kelowna in two days, so things are hectic!
×